31 July - Bexley Beat. Up or down?
It is still July but apart from the routine licensing and planning meetings there are no significant Bexley council assemblies scheduled before October; as a result it may prove to be a quiet couple of months around these parts.
Traditionally the passing of another month is marked by a summary of recent news
but for July it is very much ‘business as usual’. Another council meeting,
another barrow load of arrogance from council leader Teresa
O’Neill. Another display of
bad temper by mayor Alan Downing.
Various Freedom of Information requests submitted but no useful answers as yet. Mick
Barnbrook’s FOI seeking a copy of Will Tuckley’s business diary for May remains
unanswered even though it probably exists in electronic form and could be
exported at the click of a mouse. However Nicholas Dowling, another Bexley
Council Monitoring Group member, asked the same for June and he is far less
patient than Mick. You can be sure the Information Commissioner will be on the
receiving end of a complaint as soon as the statutory 20 days have expired.
The County Gate issue
arose again and exposed the very worst of Bexley council once more. The absentee
councillor Peter Craske threatening residents, all the Conservatives jeering a
resident for her membership of the Labour Party and absolutely nothing achieved in
their six years in power. Entirely typical.
In Bexley Village deputy leader Colin Campbell’s son continues to annoy many of the locals with his
‘illegal’ cab office.
The council’s Planning Office website has today listed the submission of an appeal for
57-59 Bexley High Street but I see no direct reference to the Bexley Cabs
office. (Case reference 11/00633/EAPPL.)
In Sidcup there is better news to report about the Grootendorsts’ house. A new
contractor has fixed the roof and according to Mrs. G. made more progress in his
first week than
her rogue builder (Chris McGuiness and MAC Construction) did in two months.
Facebook
and Twitter are almost complete mysteries to me, however I have noted
Bexley Beat on Facebook which looks at Bexley though spectacles more rose
coloured than mine and appears to be a thinly veiled advert for ASDA, but none
the worse for that. I look at my MP’s and my ex-councillor’s Twitter feed
now and again but probably the most interesting ones are blocked to those like
me who are not signed up.
I’m told that councillor Philip Read is a regular commentator on this blog and loves to Tweet
his opinion of it. According to those reports I am a BNP supporter and it is flattering to think
he sees Bonkers as a thorn in his side and will stoop to any level to discredit it. Well maybe
not any level, he never got around to obscene blogging on
the
Bonkers domain he registered. He left that to one of his mates. For the
record the only political party of which I’ve been a member is the Conservatives in
the 1980s and early 1990s. David Cameron once commented that “Too many Tweets make a
Tw*t”. There can be few better examples than Bexley councillor Philip Read.
Looking to the immediate future Olly Cromwell’s appeal is due in Court next Friday.
Councillor Melvin Seymour’s fantasy police statement about dog faeces and
letterboxes may yet be exposed as a fabrication but the falsehood has already
fooled one judge so any optimism about the outcome may be misplaced. The police
had copies of the original Tweets so always knew Seymour statement was wrong
but their priority must have been pleasing their masters rather than the truth.
29 July - Total anonymity leads to confusion
Messages sent via the Bonkers’ Contact Form
arrive as if they have been sent by me to myself; absolutely no identifying information
is included unless the sender decides to include it. It is a mixed blessing and I have just been
painfully reminded of that fact.
All incoming messages are filed under the sender’s name or pseudonym but the totally
anonymous get dumped in a single folder labelled ‘Anonymous’. I made an exception
last year for a series of significant messages claiming to come from within Bexley council.
The first such message that made me believe it was different from the run of the mill
anonymous arrived in October 2011 and the last that I thought to be in the same category
was very nearly three months ago.
The new Obscene Blog Timeline refers to anonymous messages and it has
regrettably upset someone. An anonymous informant has written to say (s)he never ever mentioned the
Obscene Blog and may therefore believe my account to be false. The writer is most
definitely not happy with any implication that good information was provided initially, instilling confidence,
and the later inaccuracies may have been more than simply unfortunate.
The new message has compelled a reassessment of the situation and I am kicking myself
for overlooking an alternative scenario; that two (it could be more but
I shall discount the possibility) well connected council insiders were messaging me over
the same period but only one took an interest in the Obscene Blog.
I filed a total of 53 incoming messages under ‘Council anonymous’ in six months
and came to believe them all to be the product of one author. That was wrong, grouping
anonymous messages to unnamed individuals can never be an exact science but when
writing the Timeline I lost sight of the fact that my message filing was only a
best guess. There is little consolation in the complaining
informant making the same assumption that (s)he was unique.
The Timeline has been modified. The changes are few because it will always be true
that certain names were anonymously named but there is no longer an assumption that all
messages were from a single source.
If anyone is tempted to send an anonymous message in future it would be helpful to allocate
themselves a pseudonym and stick to it, thereby much reducing the opportunity for confusion
and unintended offence.
28 July - Bexley council in HD? Horrendously Dodgy
If
you believe what Bexley council told the local press a year ago (News Shopper 27 April 2011) they plan to
webcast their meetings once the new Civic Centre opens. However if you believe
what they told John Watson of the
Bexley Council Monitoring Group they will not. I’m not sure that is bad news.
Recording would catch out the rewriters of history; mayor Alan Downing’s
pen-jabbing antics and demands to “sit down” would not so easily be labelled
neither dismissive nor arrogant.
On the other hand I would probably lazily give up taking notes at meetings
and then take twice as long to blog about meetings while rechecking every last detail.
Yesterday’s report in the Daily Telegraph offers what may be a good forecast of how
any webcasting would be received here in Bexley. A blog summarising the highlights
may make meetings appear to be more exciting than they are and a webcast
can never replace the real thing where you can in various ways express your
feelings about the charade being played out before you.
If Bexley council has changed its mind about webcasting I’m not going to get too
upset by it, it might force them to operate the microphones responsibly but you
can be sure any recording would be edited. In any case there are residents who
would happily do the job for nothing if only Bexley council would operate within
existing government guidelines.
27 July - Bexley council. A matter of priorities
Just
a few days after revealing
the new complaints job
at Bexley council I have been sent a copy of the first fruit of their new found
interest in complaint handling. Adorned with their ever more incongruous slogan,
‘Listening to you, working for you’ comes a lavishly produced booklet for staff
giving guidance on how they might dodge awkward questions. Nothing new on how to answer
questions properly yet, but that’s not the priority.
Councils have a massive armoury of defence weapons against doing anything they
don’t want to do. The Information Commissioner (ICO) has no real teeth, it recommended
I go to law myself when Bexley council refused its instructions on my Subject Access Request.
The Local Government
Ombudsman (LGO) supports criminal intent, and if all else fails councils can
make up their
own rules to suit themselves; and
change them on a whim
when they don’t. When backed into a corner a council has a simple escape route.
It simply applies the ‘vexatious’ label and refuses to talk to you, hence the
haste in publishing the new booklet on when and how that ruse can be exploited.
It is only right that there is an agreed policy on dealing with complaints. Eleven years ago I
was threatened with the council’s
‘vexatious’ nonsense for writing three letters over two years
covering seven different subjects. It wasn’t vexatious then and probably
wouldn’t be under the new guidance so if it prevents rogue staff
making unjustified threats it may have some merit, but was fending off the more
vociferous complainants really the highest priority issue requiring attention?
Behaviour that might fall foul of the new rules include “making lengthy phone
calls, emails expecting immediate responses, detailed letters or emails every
few days”. Other things that may get you ruled vexatious are “Changing the
complaint as the matter proceeds” and “Refusing to accept a decision”. When I
found myself in the latter position and facing silence I started this website.
Maybe Bexley council has yet to learn the lessons of unintended consequences.
Decisions on vexatiousness will in future be made at Deputy Director level and there is
no appeal process other than to take the matter to the ICO or LGO.
Once labelled vexatious by Bexley council they may absolutely refuse to talk to
you again or limit communication to one method only, email, letter etc. They
may prevent you using services such as libraries, or to access any
council building. Draconian stuff if you upset a council officer as I did with
my three letters in two years.
I am sure some in the borough will be difficult to handle but Bexley has already
shown how easily it allows common sense to fly from its
window. Both Peter Ellershaw and Will Tuckley wrote to Olly Cromwell banning
him from council premises for following
the Communities Secretary’s guidance
on filming and Tuckley lied to the police in an attempt to stop “criticism of
councillors”. Guidance is necessary but is there any senior council manager in Bexley
one could trust to make the right decision? Based on what we have seen so far I think the answer must be no.
26 July (Part 2) - Bexley council. It’s never their fault
I find myself disinclined to make complaints to Bexley council
at every opportunity, that appears to be the job of the Bexley Council Monitoring Group
(BCMG). Whereas I find the lack of straight answers to be a disincentive to expending
the necessary time, the BCMG refuses to let anything pass unchallenged. It may be some
sort of ‘cake and eat it’ hypocrisy but I admit to finding Bexley council’s excuses for
abrogating their responsibilities and proclaiming their eternal innocence fascinating in
their inventiveness. Here is the latest to have come my way.
When I showed up for the Audit Committee meeting last month, BCMG members were
in the Civic Centre foyer so I lingered awhile and they persuaded me
the Standards Committee would be more interesting. As a result we all dashed up the stairs
to the Public Gallery with barely a minute to spare.
The Committee wasn’t expecting guests and already seated around their table ready to go.
There were no spare chairs. A council officer jumped to attention, gathered her thoughts
and said she would fetch some. I went with her to help and BCMG member Michael Barnbrook
did the same. The two of us each carried a stack of chairs back to the Public Gallery
and placed them very close behind the seated councillors. Probably it was uncomfortably
close and we were made to shuffle them backwards.
Mick and Elwyn Bryant weren’t happy because although the Public Gallery has a hearing
loop no microphones were provided. Without them their electronic ear trumpets aren’t
a lot of good. They muttered their discontent though how loudly I am no longer
sure. We all spent the meeting leaning well forward to pick up what we could but
it wasn’t easy. Even one councillor at the table, Alan Deadman, said he was
having some difficulty hearing everything that was said.
Mr. Barnbrook, as is his way, put in a formal complaint about the lack of
facilities for the disabled and got a reply from Head of Committee Services, Kevin Fox; the same
man who invented the story that the council’s Standing Order
84 which allows for the public to be excluded from any portion of a meeting that
might discuss salaries, could be misinterpreted to prevent any meeting taking
place at all. How would he reject a complaint about the council’s failure to make any gesture towards
satisfying its responsibilities under Equalities legislation? He lied of course,
the alternative was to admit a council failure.
Mr. Fox has said in a letter that when Mr. Barnbrook “arrived the committee officer was in the
process of preparing the room”. This is totally false. I walked in alongside Mr. Barnbrook
and know exactly what happened. Unlike Mr. Fox I was there. The
committee officer was sitting at the committee table with her papers in front of
her seconds before the appointed start time. She responded quickly and I have no
criticism; the absence of chairs was rectified without delay. Why does Mr. Fox
feel compelled to say otherwise? Orders from above perhaps?
“The seating was arranged near to where members of the Committee were sitting” the
council’s letter claims, not the most precise of terms. I accept the seating was
“near” but it wasn’t near enough. Surely that much was obvious from the position
Barnbrook and Bryant chose for their chairs before being made to move them?
Mr. Fox
also wrote that members of the public must say if they cannot hear proceedings but the precedents for that set by
the pen jabbing mayor Alan Downing are not
encouraging. As he demonstrated in an ugly display of bad temper, mayor Downing
explodes in fury when anyone says they cannot hear. Having witnessed that,
Mr. Barnbrook may have been unwilling to make a big enough fuss to be noticed
by the chairman of the Standards Committee.
Fox’s wonderfully verbose conclusion is that in future “members of the public
with disabilities will be requested to contact that officer a reasonable time in
advance of the meeting to advise they will be attending a particular meeting so
that whatever provision is reasonable can be made”. It’s to become a bit like
wheelchair users who wish to get
a train to London from Erith only worse, at
least you can get to London on the down platform at half hourly intervals. If
you are deaf and wish to see Bexley council in action and hear them too, you
either give them notice or risk an intemperate pen jabbing. Take your pick.
26 July (Part 1) - Local Government Ombudsman. Unfit for purpose
According the the LGO, councils are at liberty to fabricate a story and submit it to the police with a request that they prosecute and their leaders and chief executives do not owe their populations any duty of care to prevent such blatant dishonesty.
It
is according to the LGO’s investigator Helen Bingham, up to the police to deal
with that sort of abuse of power and the LGO has no role to play. I can see a
certain amount of logic in it if police have not been wined and dined at council
expense and can be trusted to carry out investigations before referring cases to
the Crown Prosecution Service rather than afterwards, but in Bexley none of that
applies. I think you will know that story by now and the details do not need to
be repeated, suffice to say I think the LGO leans over backwards to support
councils however bizarre their behaviour may be.
The
Communities and Local Government Select Committee doesn’t think much of them
either, saying the LGO must up its game.
Select Committee Report. -
BBC News -
Comment by LGO Watcher blog.
25 July - Councillor Peter Craske causes an international incident
Bexley
is 23·38 square miles of South East London where democracy is paid no
more than lip service and governed by a collection of Conservative
politicians with a propensity for lying and putting themselves into financially
beneficial positions. The Maldives is a collection of 1,192 islands spread over
35,000 square miles of the Indian Ocean with a democracy built on coups and
guns and parliamentary brawling. So what is the connection?
The connection is our very own 42 year old from Sidcup, councillor Peter Harold Craske.
The Maldivian government has been trying to improve its international
relationships with the aid of lobbying companies since 2009 and it engaged
The Campaign Company
(TCC) to rebuild its reputation in the UK. A company co-founder (who left at the
beginning of 2012) allegedly went to the Maldives to tout for the business and TCC would appear to have been well
placed to lobby the Labour government. Another co-founder is described
as ‘ultra-Blairite’ and the company had already established links with and
done work for several high profile Labour personalities. It was however comparatively weak where
the Conservatives were concerned and engaged Peter Craske for his claimed ability to
exploit equally high profile Conservative contacts - still in opposition at the time. I can
imagine this is a contract that would have been in safer hands with fellow Blackfen
& Lamorbey councillor, Katie Perrior’s and
her PR company, In-house,
but maybe she was still tied up with Boris Johnson’s 2008 election campaign.
Maldivian politics is nothing if not complicated with several parties and many
sets of initials. Peter Craske managed to muddle those initials and claim
alliances where none exist. The repercussions are still rumbling on in Maldivian
circles. The British group ‘Left Futures’ has summarised the situation (below left)
and The Minivan News (a Maldivian web based newspaper) has not yet stopped reporting it (below right).
On
the left is councillor Peter Craske’s email (to his Conservative contacts presumably), expressing
his concern for arrested politicians and pleading their case. He did not cover
himself with glory with his claim of an imagined alliance and he eventually had
to apologise for his error.
An incompetent Bexley Conservative councillor doing a bit on the side for a left leaning
pressure group, exploiting his political contacts and provoking an international
incident in 2009/10 is probably just par for the Bexley course but bearing in mind
how ready he has been to lambast Labour councillors for their views it does shed
some light on how deep his convictions really are. Not as deep as a trough of cash
presumably. One must wonder if council leader Teresa O’Neill knew what he was up
to and approved.
I would guess she did because in November 2009 she was happy to put council
business in the hands of Craske’s unlikely employers. In Teresa O’Neill’s ‘Report of the
Leader of the Council’ dated 4th November 2009 she announced…
One can only guess whether Craske was on commission for introducing new business
to The Campaign Company but people like him don’t usually do anything for nothing.
The Campaign Company’s website has at least two references to doing work for
Bexley council. As has been said so many times before, how is it that Bexley
council contracts so often go to organisations run by or otherwise associated
with Bexley councillors?
Click on any of the five document extracts to view the originals.
24 July - The Obscene Blog. A daily diary
After
these two Bexley councillors invented their story about “dog faeces” and “letter
boxes” and persuaded their police servants to swallow the lie, it took just two days
for a Bexley resident to be arrested and charged. Ultimately it led to a criminal record
and this blog and others found itself unprepared for the media interest. It took several
days to cobble together a
chronology of events and meanwhile quite a lot of misinformation was disseminated.
With the possibility of more media interest in the months to come I don’t intend
to be caught unprepared again. The issue, as you will have guessed, being that of
Bexley council’s obscene blog.
Unlike when Bexley councillors spin a story to the police there has been no
instant flurry of activity. Bexley council’s crime was committed 14 months ago
and still the matter is unresolved, although it has advanced somewhat since the
former Borough Commander said that “all enquiries have been exhausted” together
with an assurance that the blog was “not generated from a Bexley council
computer”. Without pressure from two MPs, there the case may have rested. Thanks to
them we now have “an individual arrested” but not yet named or charged.
It has been a long road, there have been false trails laid, inaccurate accusations
and lots of letters. For their dilatory approach and statements last year, some
former Bexleyheath police officers now find themselves accused at the highest
level of neglect of duty and bias towards Bexley council. The police whitewash
machine has already been readied for action but a counter attack has been launched
against it. The details of that must remain under wraps for a while but there is no longer
any reason why most of the story cannot be provided in a media friendly fashion. Later today
a new Home page
providing a ‘day by day’ account of the blog investigation will go on line and advised via
the RSS feed.
It wouldn’t be true to say it contains nothing that hasn’t already been
revealed in this blog, because it does. There have been times when blogs have been
vague about dates for a variety of reasons which are no longer valid, so the new
‘diary’ can be precise. There is more new than that but what you will not learn is the
name of Bexley’s obscene blogger. Until the police provide a name and say it is OK to publish
it that is the way things must stay and so far they have done neither. As you will learn
from the ‘diary’, circumstantial evidence has led me well and truly up the garden path in
the past but I am hoping my antennae are more finely tuned this time around.
I think what puzzles me most about the culprit is that (s)he left the blog on line
for more than two weeks before pulling it. Surely if one does something that
stupid, under the influence of alcohol or a mind altering drug perhaps, then next
day, having sobered up, you’d realise just how stupid you have been and wipe it
all away as soon as you can? Did the culprit not have a moment of sanity in the
whole of those two weeks?
Note dated 17th August 2012. At
an appeal hearing
where both Seymour and Bauer were called as witnesses and cross examined
it became clear that it was Seymour who had dishonestly exaggerated the content of the Tweet
in order to attempt a miscarriage of justice and Bauer had merely sent him a copy and took no part in its embellishment.
23 July (Part 2) - Bexley council arguing with Eric Pickles again
Eric
Pickles the Communities Secretary labours under a quaint misapprehension that
councils have the best interests of their populations at heart and given the
choice between honest transparency and secrecy and deception they will choose
the former. In Bexley that is never true.
The prime example was the way Bexley council
changed its
Constitution for no other reason than to thwart
Eric’s guidance on handling
“armchair auditors” and “citizen journalists”. And they are still at it.
Mr. Pickles put out a ‘Recommended practice for local authorities on data
transparency’ for consultation. The item that grabbed the headlines was to list the names of local
government employees who earn more than £58,200 a year. Talking about their
over-inflated salaries,
Bexley has the sixth
highest in the country, is anathema
to Bexley council, they even deliberately misapplied inappropriate rules to
suppress discussion on the subject
after 2,219 residents asked for a debate.
Bexley council is campaigning that Pickles shouldn’t be allowed to get away with his
ideas for opening the books to public scrutiny. It has asked him to exempt from
publication any sums handed out to voluntary organisations that are £10,000 and
under. Please keep them secret they plead. Are they handing out money to organisations
that are a little too close to home perhaps?
“Bexley believes that £58,200 for the disclosure of senior salary levels
is set at too low a threshold. We feel that only the salaries of Chief Officers
should be published.” So there they go again. Bexley wants absolutely nothing to
do with openness and transparency and is fighting a rear-guard
action against their own government. Everywhere you look they don’t want you to. There must be a
reason for it and it’s not going to be an honest one.
Link to pdf file.
23 July (Part 1) - Bexley council complaints
Last
year, after one too many reprimands from the Information Commissioner and
Local Government Ombudsman,
Bexley council decided that it was time they appointed someone to help get them
out of trouble. Adrian Barber was appointed Temporary Complaints manager and
now it looks as though the position is to be made permanent.
The salary on offer is a generous thirty odd thousand pounds and if you think
that is more than enough to spend on keeping the complaints service on track
then you presumably haven’t noticed that the post reports to a Complaints Policy
and Performance Manager. And then there will be a Deputy Director and a Director
above that. It may have been more effective to look into why Bexley council gets
so much criticism from the LGO and ICO. But this way there is more money to be made.
The link to that particular job will no doubt soon expire.
22 July (Part 2) - Olympic shame
A
tradition established in Nazi Germany in 1936 is to be played out in Bexley
today and not unnaturally passes by the borough’s very own Gestapo Headquarters.
Bonkers is and will remain an Olympic free zone; nice to see the sun shining on
those who wish to see how
Bexley council has spent our £271,000
but apart from the considerable drain on my pocket it isn’t something that I care about at all.
The sooner it is all over the better. However a very different flame was marched
through Barnet yesterday, much more worthy of space here.
Barnet is another of those Big Bad Mad Conservative boroughs that regards
residents with total disdain. In some ways Barnet is worse than Bexley but
unlike the crooks and charlatans we have elected, the Barnet crew have only just
woken up to the possibilities of calling in favours from the police and
encouraging them to take a leading role in suppressing Barnet residents
and its many critics.
Bexley has outsourced nearly all its services to the point that one must wonder
what the Chief Executive is left to do. Nothing at all if the Freedom of
Information request for a copy of his business appointments for May 2012 is any
indication. They still can’t find an answer. Barnet has embarked on the same
course. Another similarity is their attitude to motorists. Here the
megalomaniac Peter Craske introduced phone only parking and
increased parking charges, tripling some, yet managed to reduce parking revenue
all at the same time. That takes a special sort of skill.
Our friends up north have had their own Peter Craske to do much the same thing.
His name is Brian Coleman and he achieved the same 40% reduction in shop takings
that were reported in Bexleyheath. Funnily enough both these men have lost their
cabinet positions, although for very different reasons.
The protests in Barnet have been much better organised than in Bexley. Here the
council bends its own rules to reject petitions and may well have had its
reputation comprehensively trashed, but except for those who might be fearful of
the next loud knock on their doors, they have tended to get away with their
dishonesty and law breaking pretty much scot free. In Barnet they do things differently,
they take to the streets. The final spark was Barnet council calling for police assistance
when they began to lose the democratic argument over parking.
One of the traders pushed to the brink of insolvency by Barnet's parking
policies put up a protest notice in the window of her Cafe Buzz window with a
few copies in other nearby windows. For that crime (†) the cafe owner, Helen Michael
was arrested and interviewed by officers from Scotland Yard. If Scotland Yard seems a
bit over the top to you, it gets worse. The officers were from
SO15 and if that sounds like a familiar code it will be because it’s the
anti-terrorist outfit. That’s right, for exhibiting a poster protesting about
parking charges, Barnet council has had Helen Michael accused of plotting to
bring down the entire nation.
I cannot possibly tell you the whole story here but a perusal of the
barnet-eye
and
brokenbarnet blogs will fill in the details. Almost needless to say, Barnet
council in true Nazi style banned the protest flame from entering their Victoria
Park just a matter of hours before the event.
The links to the Barnet blogs are sample pages from many on the same subject.
Follow their internal links for the full horrific story of yet another Tory
council running amok. But not even Barnet council dares to defy
Eric Pickles’ guidance
on openness and transparency. That is an affront to democracy almost unique to Bexley’s criminal ridden council.
† The notice
in her cafe window did not bear Helen Michael’s name and address and remained in place for a day or two at the beginning of the May
election period. That was deemed to be an offence under election law by Barnet council. But a terrorist offence? How can that possibly be justified?
By the same logic that puts a man in court for using a metaphor about flaming
torches and pitchforks I suppose, except that in the latter case the man
concerned hadn’t mentioned the fateful words. Not that that bothered the lying
Teresa O’Neill and Will Tuckley.
PS. OK, I’ll admit it. My sister alerted me to to
www.bbc.co.uk/torchrelay
and I did find myself glued to the procession through the streets we know so
well. I think that was the main attraction, that and seeing living proof that Bexley’s
pinch points by design are barely wide enough for a large modern coach to squeeze through.
A magnificent technical achievement by the BBC if I may say so. If you missed
the live broadcast you can still see it via the link above, fast forward to the
bit that interests you most if necessary. Hall Place 18:00. Police Station 18:22.
The
tasteless
undertaker’s premises provoked a few comments, none favourable. A lady from
Beckenham said she had employed Uden’s a few years ago when her mother died but
there is no way she would have done if their premises there had been festooned
with notices and traffic cones. In her opinion it looks as though an old family
business has been taken over by a glitzy American outfit.
Ordinarily that would be nothing to do with me but that ‘Working with Bexley council’
logo is intriguing. What is that all about? Are they employed to bury Bexley council’s
dirty secrets perhaps?
Another reader sent me the rather startllng photograph. Maybe one receptacle could be
labelled Cremations and the other Burials and Uden & Sons could provide the first
24/7 DIY body disposal service.
The feature on dropped kerbs
provoked comment too, a bit along the lines of ‘what is newsworthy about that?
Bexley council does that sort of thing every day’. My own driveway is at the end of
a cul-de-sac so I drive straight into it, the only problem
being it is steep enough to scrape the underside of a car if approached at more than
a snail’s pace. I don’t have to think about turning sharply on a possibly busy road.
It has been claimed that Bexley council is reluctant to allow dropped kerbs
wider than the drive entrance and that they are oblivious to the fact that the
rear wheels will describe a different arc to the front and therefore tend to hit
the full height kerb. Actually I’m not sure that Bexley council’s ignorance of steering
geometry is news either. Isn’t it a fact that within the past two years they
have designed and built two roundabouts that weren’t negotiable by buses and
lorries? Who can forget the
Ruxley Corner and
Wickham Lane
Peter Craske authorised fiascos?
21 July (Part 2) - County Gate. The blame game
We have known for a long time that Bexley council has achieved nothing for County Gate residents in the six years the Conservatives have been ruling the roost. We learned only last Wednesday that councillor Peter Craske threatened to throw his toys out of his perambulator if the beleaguered residents dared to criticise him. We have also seen that the only people prepared to speak up for County Gate have been Munir Malik and Seán Newman, both Labour councillors from the other extremity of the borough and we know from last year’s News Shopper report and Mrs. Dakshy’s revelations that Craske is totally unable to get along with anyone who isn’t an extreme right wing Conservative.
Seán
Newman expressed the hope that Craske’s replacement, Gareth Bacon, might
prove more effective but unfortunately both he and is wife Cheryl were absent
from last Wednesday’s council meeting. Well if you take on nine or ten jobs across the metropolis you
are going to need a holiday sooner or later and so we were prevented from hearing
Gareth’s views on Craske’s sorry saga. So what does he have to say on his ward
website? Oh dear. It’s all Labour’s fault!
I’m not sure that Gareth should be instantly labelled a liar because I have
never before come across circumstances in which that would be justified. The
footnote is probably a clue. A footnote by someone not averse to sweeping
criminality under the carpet and who we know usually sanctions Bexley council‘s lies. The
same person who assured us on another website that Seán Newman was unaware that
the railway line to Dartford went through Bexleyheath. The lies are so poor they
would be ridiculed in an infant school playground, a sure case of
a mouth opening and
a belly rumbling.
We have got to know an awful lot about councillor Peter Craske in the last year or so.
Throwing toys and insults from his pram has proved to be his normal mode of
operation and Mrs. Dakshy can be thankful that he didn’t report her to the
police for “criticising councillors at a personal level”.
Over recent weeks it has become all but certain that Peter Craske was part of the
contingent that reported me to former Borough Commander Stringer for that very ‘offence’.
CS Stringer told me nearly six months ago that he couldn’t properly explain
or apologise for his force’s mistakes over the harassment issue because to do so
would reveal too much about his investigation into Bexley council’s obscene blog as
the two were “inextricably linked”. His comment made absolutely no sense to me at
the time but I think it does now. It would be nice to think that councillor
leader Teresa O’Neill and chief executive Will Tuckley will eventually be done
for attempting to pervert the course of justice but I doubt they will however
guilty they may be.
21 July (Part 1) - No commission required. None paid
If
you Google ‘Camden Oak Bexley’ the first item that pops up is ‘Councillor
Details - PublicAccess Bexley Council’ and it goes on to give the address of
deputy leader Colin Campbell: Camden Oak, 25 Camden Road, Bexley, DA5 3NS. The same
address as sometimes given by his son, the owner of
Bexley Cabs.
It looks to be a nice house but possibly not nice enough because
if you wander past Village Estates in Bexley Village you may notice an advert
for a very similar house.
Not just similar, if you examine the original
photographs closely, identical in every last detail. So have our two favourite
businessmen made another killing somewhere and off to pastures new?
I
would have thought that a nice country pub would suit them, if they could find one cheap.
Preferably a Free House. That would be very Enterprise Inn don’t you think? Plough Inn a new furrow
might make a nice change. Or have they already Bean there, done that? Or someone.
We seem to have lost Peter Craske and good riddance. If only we could be sure
the whole rotten ship was sinking.
Apologies for extreme obscurity. Usual legal restrictions apply.
20 July - Full Council Meeting - More serious bits
Following the Public and Planted Questions allowed at a council meeting, councillors are
allowed to assuage their own curiosity. Councillor Brenda Langstead asked “How is
the council helping young people in need of housing?“ That's an easy one to
start off with. Bexley council offers no special help to young people.
Councillor Margaret O’Neill asked cabinet member Biffa Bailey to “confirm the
current number of empty residential properties in Bexley” and was promptly
reprimanded by Biffa for asking the same question at the last council meeting.
No she didn’t Biffa, or don’t you understand the meaning of the word current?
The number was said to be 754 - currently.
Councillor
June Slaughter asked the first question likely to be of any interest
to the general population. “What interest has been shown by local residents and
groups in being involved in the Olympic torch relay?” The responsible Cabinet
Member, councillor Don Massey who is
not
in the least bit interested in democracy pretended he was a man of the
people. “Enormous”. “Overwhelming”. “Amazing”, which is not the sort of evidence
that you would expect a magistrate to regard as acceptable.
Well who exactly, which organisations, councillor Slaughter wanted to know. Massey
fumbled with his papers and produced his list and proceeded to read it out. Following
his recitation of eight names I had never heard of - just who or what is the
Bexleyheath Scrap Metal Band? - Massey came to a stumbling halt. That was it.
How much would that lot cost to support was the next and pertinent question.
£271,000 came the reply. I’ll wait while you get back off the floor and get your breath back…
Well if it helps you swallow your disbelief, let me tell you that Bexley council
hopes to get as much as 60% of that back from another tax raising body but
failing that, and the little matter of the 40%, it will be paid by Bexley. i.e. you
and me. Someone threw an unwarranted jibe at councillor Slaughter reminding us
she was against the £20 a year Olympic levy. Well good for her, not all of us
can afford to live in £875,000 houses.
The two cabinet members for Children’s and Adult’s Services, Katie Perrior and
Chris Taylor respectively were asked questions about their portfolios and both
gave a good account of themselves which I have no reason to doubt.
The
Clown Prince in the gold regalia was woken up by his alarm clock and that
was the end of questions. We will not get an answer to councillor Newman’s question
to councillor Don Massey about why he believes that increased charges for
leisure facilities have not led to the reduced usage. The secret of how one small
area of S.E. London is able to defy the laws of economics that apply elsewhere
remains safe for a little longer.
Next on the Agenda was a Motion from councillor Chris Ball - leader of the
opposition - seeking Bexley council’s endorsement of the need to keep energy
bills within bounds. He said that the average Bexley household pays £1,345 a
year for domestic fuel, that in Bexleyheath and Crayford some 12·5% of residents
are in fuel poverty and this is close to being the worst figure in London.
Not being a politician I’m not sure what these Motions are all about. It seems
to me that the idea is that one party puts forward the suggestion that
motherhood and apple pie is a thoroughly good thing but to do it in such a way
that the opposing party has to reject it. Then the fun is in watching everyone
try to avoid the elephant trap. This time the apple pie idea was to be critical
of greedy foreign energy companies and the elephant trap was a proposal that
government should legislate against them.
Councillor Peter Catterall, the closest thing we get to a reasonable man on
Bexley council, proposed a small amendment that would substitute the elephant
trap with something no more offensive than a mouse trap. He proceeded to debate
the issue with councillor Ball in his usual eloquent way until the mayoral clown
got bored and told him he had heard enough.
‘King Cnut Seymour’
then thought he had something worthwhile to say, this time
the tide he was trying to defy was high intellect, but in trying to compete with
head teacher Ball and university professor Catterall he was only able to
demonstrate his many inadequacies. The Cnut man’s contribution to
intelligent debate was to blame the Labour government for the present high
energy prices (well I suppose Kyoto was a big mistake) and the “champagne socialism” of
their present leader Ed Miliband who wanted “to take us into the Euro”. A highly
intelligent and relevant contribution to the debate on energy costs worthy of
the daftest thick haired decorator’s brush I am sure you would agree. The
amended Motion was carried unanimously, the first time I have ever seen every
hand go up at the same time.
As
time was pressing on I was hoping that council leader Teresa O’Neill would
not spend too much time on reading her report which takes up 16 pages of the
Agenda. My mind rustled up an old Scottish saying, one of many evocative little
gems learned when I had to spend too much of my life in Glasgow. Their
description of a hot air merchant fond of the sound of their own voices was of
someone who opened their mouths to let their bellies rumble. I decided that if
O’Neill was going to do nothing but let her belly rumble then a bus would be
more attractive option.
And so it proved. Within three minutes I had heard quite enough of how “Bexley
had done it for Boris” and of the thousands who had thronged the Broadway to
watch the mayor strut his stuff from Christ Church to Clock Tower and as she
moved into extolling the virtues if the Olympic torch relay it seemed clear
she was merely embellishing her Agenda boasts. I did a Usain Bolt for the door
and the back end of a 229.
19 July (Part 2) - Full Council Meeting - The serious bits
It
was stand up, sit down, stand up again as the new mayor failed to make an
appearance on time. Trouble adjusting his chains I expect. I assume we are
supposed to stand up out of respect for the office, surely it cannot be for the
incumbent. If you are in need of mild amusement during the initial
proceedings listen to the chaplain praying for wisdom and good decision
making, what follows must test his own faith to the limit.
Clowning Downing went through the usual rigmarole about no one being allowed
to record his mistakes and if there is a fire we are to exit via the rear door
into the car park. No one ever explains where we are to go if the seat of the
fire is in the rear passageway and the back door is inaccessible. After that the
Clown said everyone was to treat everyone else with courtesy and respect. Some
hope: he doesn’t so why should I?
As already noted, ex-cabinet member Peter Harold Craske did not make an
appearance, did not sign the attendance register, did not send his apologies and
nobody noted his absence when the mayor asked if there were any more absentees. Nobody
that is apart from some members of the public who called out “where’s Craske?”.
Within seconds of the meeting commencing the first Downing inspired
cock-up occurred. It is hard to say exactly what happened
but councillor Stefano Borella (Labour) stood up with a proposal that… and that is as far as things got
because the chain entangled clown on the top table told him to sit down again.
Apparently his sin was not putting up his hand first, so Stefano dutifully went
through a Jack in the Box routine sticking up his paw at the appropriate
moment. Thus the Clown’s massive ego and miniscule intellect was satisfied and
councillor Borella was allowed to suggest another Labour member, Seán
Newman, be allowed to join the library committee, whatever that may be, to allow
a measure of “cross party representation”.
Councillor Munir Malik seconded and then the mayor‘s brain belatedly kicked in
and everything came to a grinding halt. He had muddled two Agenda items and he
wasn’t where he thought he was. We had to start again on some other subject. When
councillor Borella eventually got back to his theme it was inevitably thrown out
unanimously by the Conservatives who don’t like the idea of Labourites being given
the opportunity to rock their cosy little boat.
There was then a deputation by the residents of County Gate (Longlands ward),
the narrow road that is chosen by those using Sat Nav to leave the A2 near
the border with Eltham. The deputation was presented by Mrs. Dakshy (or Mrs. Darkshy
according to the mayor) who was
featured
in last week’s News Shopper. She did a first rate job of exposing the dishonesty of
Bexley council and illustrated why I have so often found it necessary to use the words
‘vindictive’ and ‘spiteful’ to describe their default position.
The details of the complaint were
provided last year.
Councillor Peter Craske blamed Greenwich council for the problems and got himself plastered
all over the News Shopper’s front page for his pains (29 June 2011). This time it was revealed that Craske
had earlier threatened to order all his officers to abandon County Gate if Mrs. Dakshy
or her supporters dared to criticise him. Makes you think that Craske
might be behind my Harassment Letter and the obscene blog if that is how he
reacts to criticism - what a disreputable individual he is.
Because of Craske’s lack of interest Mrs. Dakshy
went to the Labour Party for help, I had wondered how it was that councillor
Malik was involved when the issue first came to light
a year ago. This time she was sponsored by Seán Newman. Mrs. D. went on to reveal that
she had become a member of the Labour Party which provoked a loud outbreak of
desk thumping and jeering by the Conservative morons present. The geriatric
mayor had already forgotten his plea for courtesy and respect so sat there
grinning like the idiot he undoubtedly is.
Councillor Mike Slaughter (Longlands) said that a while ago he canvassed every
house in County Gate, for exactly what purpose he didn’t say, and was
immediately met with a chorus of disbelief. All the residents present insisted
that he had not knocked on their door. Councillor Gillespie (Longlands)
said that since the Labour Party began to sponsor the issue no one had
bothered to complain to ward councillors. Mrs. Dakshy said he had been copied in
to every email. Councillor Newman hoped that Gareth Bacon, the newly responsible
cabinet member and also Longlands ward councillor would prove to be more
effective than Peter Craske. It’s not the highest of aspirations but I am sure
everyone will agree. (Councillor Bacon was not at the meeting and had offered his apologies.)
Councillor Malik said he had recent discussions with a Greenwich councillor and
was told the major problem was Craske. Mrs. Dakshy advanced the view that had
[Conservative] Bromley been involved there would have been no problem but Craske “had a problem
dealing with a different ideology”. For reasons that were not immediately
apparent, councillor Mike Slaughter thought that Mrs. Dakshy was “putting work in
jeopardy”. What work is hard to say. No one contradicted Mrs. Dakshy when she
said that in six years no one had got around to putting up even the simplest of
signs. Eg. ‘Not suitable for heavy vehicles’. What sort of absolutely useless
uncaring council doesn’t try such a simple and cheap solution?
Councillor
Borella asked Mrs. Dakshy if she had a long term goal. She said
County Gate had a wide sweeping entry point leading to the narrow section.
That entrance needed to be narrowed; as it is the police have to be called to
escort reversing lorries back on to the A2.
Mrs. Dakshy had earlier referred to the filibustering of her previous deputation
and she didn’t fare a lot better this time around; a bored mayor said that “15 minutes are
well gone” and halted proceedings mid flow. I glanced at my watch and sure enough we were
three seconds beyond time. Once again no conclusion was reached.
Next on the Agenda was Questions from the Public and the council has come up with a new
restriction. From last night anyone asking a question is made to read it out in full
even though it is printed in the Agenda. Thus a further minute or two is shaved from the meagre 15
minutes allowed to question Bexley’s pathocracy.
The first question was a request to limit filibustering following leader
Teresa
O’Neill’s disgusting exhibition three months ago. “Would the leader be willing to
consider restricting answers to five minutes, yes or no?” Mr. Barnbrook wanted
to know. O’Neill waffled on at some length and Mr. Barnbrook reminded her that
he required only a simple yes or no. Our grinning geriatric went through his
courteous and respectful routine and told Mr. Barnbrook to sit down and shut up
and that if he didn’t he would throw him out of the chamber. O’Neill’s answer
eventually came. The time to be taken answering any question is “down to the responder”.
Question 2 was strategically withdrawn by Mr. John Watson to give Danny Hackett
some chance of asking his question later on. It was John’s question which Teresa
O’Neill filibustered at the last meeting to the detriment of Danny Hackett.
Question 3 looked like a plant to me. Ms. Susan Petty of 49 Collindale Avenue,
Sidcup, DA15 9DN asked councillor ‘Biffa’ Bailey “What benefits does the Cabinet
Member for Economic Development and Regeneration think a Waitrose store will
bring to Sidcup?”
Biffa, who must have heard the audience comment, began her response by stating the question was not a
plant and I might have believed her but for two significant admissions. We had
not in fact heard Ms. Petty ask the question, we had heard someone else drafted in
at the last moment because Ms. Petty had not shown up. Back in April 2011
the
Constitution Committee said that if a questioner did not show up the question
could not be asked. How come the rules had been subverted for this question,
would the same courtesy be shown to Mick Barnbrook for example? I would doubt it
but if that wasn’t enough evidence of a plant Biffa Bailey carried on digging
the hole. She said she knew Ms. Petty well, had been working with her on the
Waitrose issue for some while and explained why she was unable to be present in
person. Not a plant! Who does she think she is kidding?
The question did nevertheless reveal that the Waitrose petition would be
presented to The John Lewis Partnership within the next couple of weeks and Biffa plans to
“fight to the very end”. If anyone from John Lewis is reading this, please do us
all a favour and give Biffa a straight answer. Or to put it in the mayor's
favoured lingo, get her to sit down and shut up.
The fearless Michael Barnbrook had another question up his sleeve. He wanted to
know what sanctions were in place to deal with councillors convicted of a
criminal offence. Leader O’Neill said nothing that made any sense so Mick
pressed his question with an example, maybe not the most appropriate example. I
would have chosen something from real council life like perjury or homophobic hatred,
but Mick, whilst making it very clear he was accusing no one and it was just an
example plucked from the air, went for paedophilia. A certain amount of hysteria
broke out with the geriatric clown warning Mr. Barnbrook once again that he was
liable to be thrown out of the chamber if he continued “to stand there insulting
me. Please be quiet and don’t call me chairman”. Teresa O’Neill also took the insulting line and in the
commotion managed to avoid answering the question.
Finally Danny Hackett, an 18 year old Labour activist, got to ask his question.
“There have been some changes to the Cabinet recently. Why has councillor Peter Craske resigned?” The answer from the leader was inevitable.
“Personal reasons”. Danny also asked why the leader had not refilled his position but instead
spread the work among two existing members. O’Neill’s response was almost as
inevitable as the first. “Because I can”. I think If I were an 18 year old the
words “arrogant fat bastard” would have crossed my mind, but the passage of fifty
years may have mellowed my thoughts on such matters. But perhaps by not a lot.
Councillors Question Time will have to wait for tomorrow, or even the weekend.
Tomorrow has been designated ‘Arguing with the Met. Police Directorate of
Professional Standards Day’.
19 July (Part 1) - Full Council Meeting
The County Gate protestors were outside the Civic Centre again
last night complete with banner. They were in
the News Shopper a week ago
because in their six years in control of the borough,
Bexley’s Conservatives have failed
to do anything at all about the intolerable traffic situation in their road. Once inside,
brief greetings were exchanged with several councillors, two more than ever before. I
won’t name any of them because one asked if I was better following
my recent ‘flu’ infection
and an admission of reading Bonkers may put someone in Teresa O’Neill’s black book.
As it happens I am a lot better but still far from being right and because of
that I am going to split this Council Meeting report into two. The first will
deal with the more entertaining and possibly scurrilous aspects of the public
shambles while another, which may come later today, but no guarantees, will deal
with the more serious but possibly equally scurrilous parts of the proceedings.
Whilst a small number of councillors appear to be happy with the briefest of
civilities, Mick Barnbrook of the Bexley Council Monitoring Group (BCMG) is still failing miserably in
his attempt to be acknowledged
by any of the female councillors. Katie Perrior is his ward councillor and for the second week in a
row Mick has tried to open a conversation with her but twice she’s hurried by saying “too busy”. Maybe she shouldn’t
have taken on Peter Craske’s Community
Safety role following his resignation if she now no longer has time for her electorate.
On the personal front it was going to be interesting to see if mayor Downing would be surprisingly good as
chairman, as was Philip Read, or
fulfill expectations, and secondly, to check the shade of purple attained by councillor Peter Craske
when subjected to curious gaze. In the event Craske didn’t show up. He not only
didn’t show up, no apology for absence was received and when the mayor asked if
there were any other absentees no one mentioned Craske. Persona non grata or
what? Is he still a councillor or is he banished? There was no signature in the member’s
attendance register either. However the Agenda for the meeting still recorded
his name on page 5 as Cabinet Member for Public Realm.
Mayor
Alan Downing proved to be everything I could wish for. If I were to be generous I might say his
performance was wooden and gaffe-prone but in truth he is a clown
out of his depth. He was petty in the manner of a Victorian headmaster and he
made an embarrassing number of elementary procedural errors. It seems to me
there is a fundamental problem with our mayoral system. The mayor has to be free
to dress up like Coco the Clown to open things or amuse youngsters who have done
well at something or the other which pretty much dictates someone not in full
time employment. So we tend to finish up with a bumbling buffoon with a less
than complete allocation of marbles in charge of the council’s most important
and complete assembly. Looking around the other potential candidates with time on
their hands I don’t see how this can change any time soon. The best councillors
look like they are holding down a decent 9 to 5 job. What is left is 100% dross.
At the start of the meeting the public consisted of 18 - most being County Gate
protestors - five BCMG members and me. By the end the numbers had dropped to
single figures when I heard one of the County Gate contingent saying that
“Craske has been charged” so naturally I asked what secret I’d been left out of.
Apparently “it was on the internet”, I don’t know where but as far as I
know for sure councillor Craske has resigned for “personal reasons”. Nothing
else. It must be true because during the meeting councillor Teresa O’Neill confirmed it that was the reason. As
everyone knows,
the leader never tells a lie.
Over the coming weekend I plan to change this website’s front page to include a
timetable of all of Bexley’s obscene blog related events. There will be one or
two new things slipped into the mix but Craske may not even get a mention. It is
tempting to indulge in gossip spreading but it is probably more sensible to stick to known facts.
18 July - Vindictive Peter Craske. His legacy lives on
I
first realised what an evil little man councillor Peter Craske could be when
the
News Shopper reported how he took a vindictive delight in financially penalising
a resident who made a mistake with his pavement crossover application. The poor
man finished up paying for the job three times over when even if the original
mistake was entirely his he shouldn’t have had to pay more than twice. But power
crazy Craske could abuse his position, so he did.
Pavement crossovers shouldn’t cost the taxpayer anything, that’s a reasonable
enough position for a council to take and Bexley council’s scale of fees starts
at £960 so long as the area of pavement is less than six square metres.
Not
far from my home Bexley council has ripped up all the paving stones and is
laying asphalt paths, cracking a few garden walls in the process. It’s the sort
of routine maintenance job that councils undertake from time to time and in
this case they notified residents of the likely disruption and offered them the
opportunity of having a crossover installed at a 25% discount. On the one hand
it sounds like a decent offer and on the other, part of a crafty scheme to get
residents to pay for routine maintenance. In practice it was a mixture of greed,
stupidity and Craske-style unreasonableness.
The second of the three photographs shows a typical paved front garden. For reasons
lost in the mist of time the dropped kerb is offset a little too far to the right.
The kerb begins to rise opposite the boundary wall and there is no adjacent crossover
for the next property. The owner, attracted by the 25% discount, asked the council if
the crossover could be extended several feet to the left which would allow both cars
to drive straight in and park parallel with each other but there may have been a problem
with a nearby lamp post so the request was turned down. So far so reasonable.
However the resident asked if the kerb could instead be made to rise just one stone
further to the left. The cost of materials and manual labour would be nothing. The
council jobsworth agreed it would be a satisfactory arrangement and proceeded to
quote £900 for the work, a price which would appear to be 25% off the standard
price for an eight square metre job. It looks like nothing short of
highway robbery. No one was asking for more than a couple of feet of pathway to be
lowered more than previously at zero cost to Bexley council. Alternatively the
entire crossing could be minimally relocated to the left of its old position.
The council jobsworth was uncompromising, he didn’t set the prices he said; lowering
one kerb stone would cost £900, take it or leave it. That’s sounds like Craske’s
rules being applied by someone with very little brain. The crossover remains as
it always was. Bexley council has lost a little revenue, one more resident is
inconvenienced and thousands more people get to know what a small minded bunch
of cretins run Bexley.
It’s a pity I didn’t get to hear about this issue earlier, there may have been an opportunity
to see if replacement cabinet member Gareth Bacon is as stupid and spiteful as ex-cabinet
member Peter Craske. I would hope not and it would be quite an achievement on Gareth’s part,
but now we will have to wait and make a judgment another time.
Council statement on pavement crossovers.
17 July - Drawbridge up. Heads in sand
Whilst
contemplating this blog in recent days and the downturn in newsworthy items my
mind kept returning to this comment (see left) on the front page of last week’s News
Shopper. It was at the foot of a feature on Bexley council investing its pension
funds in tobacco companies. Several people thought I should put my own boot in but
I am inclined to think pensions should be invested where the returns are greatest
and a quick bit of research showed that tobacco has considerably outperformed
the FTSE100 over the past ten years. Were my own pension funds similarly
invested and if so would it be hypocritical to comment? (†) But the really
interesting bit of the story as far as I was concerned is that footnote. Teresa
O’Neill, full time Bexley council leader, couldn’t spare a moment to say anything
at all to Bexley people. It is becoming the norm and it is not unexpected.
In the three years I have been commenting on Bexley council they have managed to
curb their tongues in a variety of ways, even
one time habitual liars like councillor Craske has not come out with a juicy new one for months, possibly all year. They
have also learned to block their ears; whether it be the curtailment of
questioning opportunities at council meetings, rejection of legitimate petitions
or a tendency to ignore Freedom of Information requests. The one asking for a
copy of Will Tuckley's business diary
for May is now well overdue with no comment beyond confirmation that he is being
chased for a response. Another enquiring about the possible distribution of
largesse to failed officials who are asked to leave is outstanding after more
than a year of waiting. When it eventually comes to a head I can already see
Bexley council will look very silly.
So maybe things will pick up despite the council’s efforts to enforce blackouts.
I have several reports that demand a photographic sortie and if the dreaded bug
eventually succumbs to modern medicine I shall be out on the road collecting the evidence.
† My research indicates they are not. I can breathe easily.
15 July - Does anyone know of a well managed doctor’s surgery?
After getting a couple of enquiries as to why things have been quiet around
here I thought I had better own up to having had a nasty bout of flu. High
temperature, non-stop coughing and general
lifelessness. My GP runs one of those lottery appointment systems that asks you
to call at 9 a.m. and if you don’t strike lucky you must call again at 9 the
next day. The system is presumably designed to save money and allow the doctor
to have an easy life but in the last three and a bit years it is a policy that,
for me, has escalated to a total of four hospital investigations, three of them
stemming directly from the surgery receptionist thinking it was highly amusing (†)
that I failed in their lottery five days in a row. Fortunately I count
a medical professional as a friend so I am now on antibiotics
via the back door.
None of the above is wholly responsible for there being little to report. Too
much of what has come my way recently could land me in the libel court.
If some of the recently arrived signed documents are even half true it might make
Bexley Cabs’
exploitation of planning law look like very small beer.
Unless my illicit antibiotics prove to be chalk dust I expect to be at next
Wednesday’s council meeting to see if the red-faced
one is any more red faced than usual. Nothing very significant is lined up for
earlier in the week.
† A relatively minor problem which took three weeks to
get looked into caused consequential damage. A complaint was acknowledged but never answered.
11 July - Deputy leader says “More pain on the way”
At
yesterday’s Cabinet meeting I found myself isolated well away from the other six
members of the public who were wisely wary of associating with the coughing and
spluttering one. Attending was barely worth the effort, ‘Public Cabinet’ is a
pre-rehearsed self-congratulatory stunt and
without a few ill-chosen words from councillor Peter
Craske it is inevitably more boring than ever.
Everything in Bexley is going wonderfully well it would seem and the council’s
achievements were variously described as “fantastic”, “marvellous” and “exciting”.
Council officer Sheila Murphy summed things up succinctly when she said, "The
targets we set ourselves have been achieved”. Perhaps someone else should be allowed
to set the targets.
Councillor John Fuller told us that our school attendance record is now one of
the best in London while deputy leader Colin Campbell reminded us of the further
£20 million of savings required in 2015. “Pain” he said, “was coming down the
road”. His graph of year on year expenditure savings was probably the most
interesting information coming to light all evening; unless perhaps you
regularly park in Bexley village.
Councillor Gareth Bacon having taken on his umpteenth local authority job and
now in charge of parking in Bexley announced his ‘Strategic Parking Review’
which aims to “improve the quality of life of residents while helping local
businesses flourish”. A brave ambition but Gareth Bacon starts with a huge inbuilt
advantage, he is not Peter Craske. If he were we would be suffering fines for
minor misdemeanours with our rubbish bins and bin men would have CCTV embedded
in their hats. He could not however resist repeating that Bexley has the
cheapest parking in S.E. London - which given the price increases elsewhere is not the lie it
once was - and that Bexley has more car parking spaces than Bromley. Which given
that Bromley is twice as big in area was never likely to be true and isn’t.
The first step towards “improving the quality of life of residents” is to make
the life of Bexley commuters more of a misery. Bexley High Street Car Park is to
become restricted for all day parkers. The precise arrangements are not yet
determined but the proposals are that about half of the 112 spaces will be made
‘short stay’ with a price structure of ‘Up to one hour, 90p’, 2 hours, £1.20,
4 hours, £1.60 and 24 hours, £3.80, which doesn’t seem too unreasonable to me.
But then I absolutely never park a car in Bexley, so who am I to say?
An hour after the meeting started I found myself on the bus home where another
dose of cough mixture and codeine awaited me.
9 July - Bexley introduces “People friendly, better streets” (That's what they say)
I'm afraid my plan to be at the Danson Festival came to nothing,
most of the last weekend has been spent in bed with flu or some such bug.
Probably I should still be there. However in an attempt to see if my brain is
still functioning I have been looking at some of the detail associated with the
plan to redesign the Broadway area of Bexleyheath. At the council meeting a
couple of weeks ago when councillor Peter Craske failed to turn up to give his
presentation the scheme looked attractive but the fact that Andrew Bashford
looks to be in charge does not augur well. He was the man who failed to answer
most of my questions about
Abbey Road, Belvedere which caused me to start this
website. The final straw was his claim that what he had done was in accordance
with a Transport Research Laboratory report. When I got hold of a copy and
walked along the road with their senior safety consultant I was told in no
uncertain terms it had not.
A major feature of the new scheme is that it encourages ‘shared space’
and to that end a 20 m.p.h. zone will be introduced “on parts of Broadway,
Albion Road and Arnsberg Way”. We will have to see if pedestrians feel safer
with such an arrangement and hope there is no rude awakening by speeding
emergency vehicles. The police station is in Arnsberg Way and both fire and
ambulance stations are not far outside the zone. Pedestrian crossings
are to be almost done away with.
The red As on the image above indicate where existing Pelican Crossings are to
be removed, while crossing B, adjacent to ADSA, will be retained but given a
raised platform and the bend realigned to make it more acute. The two red Cs
indicate where traffic lights with pedestrian crossing phases are to
be replaced by mini-roundabouts. D is to be a “flat
topped road hump”.
Obviously you can’t ruin nice new stone paving and carriageway by painting
double yellow lines all over it so the parts of Albion Road, Broadway and
Arnsberg Way enclosed by the yellow Xs are to become a Restricted Parking
Zone. No yellow lines, just a general ban with a few bays for the
disabled and some for loading/unloading only.
You have until 25th July to comment on these proposals; I shall not be
bothering. When I eventually managed to get hold of a list of all the comments
made on Abbey Road back in 2009, I discovered that councillor Peter Craske had
dismissed every single one. And now he seems to have dismissed himself.
Construction is scheduled to take place between 10th September and 9th November
2012 and from 14th January 2013 to July 2013.
6 July - Looking for Sandra Bauer and “Huge Bonkers”
With not a lot going on, or to be more precise, not a lot going on that can be
safely reported, I fell back at looking at the Bonkers’ webstats. One item that
has been a mystery for the past couple of months is shown above. It would be
unremarkable if someone made that search once, but every day, several times a
day and always with the same spelling mistake? Weird. For those new around here
Sandra Bauer is the deputy leader of the Labour opposition on Bexley council famed
for kicking off the ‘dog faeces through a letter box’ story which led to Olly
Cromwell getting a criminal record when the truth was rather different, dog faeces
and letter boxes being an invention that the cowardly councillor failed to admit.
No integrity, no honesty. That's two of those
Nolan Principles up the Swanee
straight away. Sandra Bauer has never come to notice for anything on Bonkers except
for that lie. What is the deputy leader of the Labour opposition for?
Over the last couple of weeks the other Bexley names being searched frequently
are Chris Taylor and Peter Craske. Craske I can understand but the name Taylor
is being most often searched as “Cllr Chris Taylor arrested”. I would suggest
that someone has an overactive imagination or knows a lot more than I do.
Councillors are not the only people arousing curiosity. Elwyn Bryant, Michael
Barnbrook and myself are all subject to searches, though maybe it is not me. My
name is shared by an international banker, an actor, a man who held the record
for rowing the length of the Thames and a puppeteer in Scotland. But if it was
me who was being searched the answer to the question is that I am not employed
by anyone to write this blog.
Questions that I cannot answer are “are there any clubs in bexley to
meet mature women” and “bexley girls with huge bonkers” and a few more which are
best not repeated here. As for those Craske questions, there is more info hidden
away in this week’s News Shopper than you will find here. I have no definitive
answers but the various indicators are more than a little interesting.
5 July (Part 2) - Upping their game
Since the
council’s AGM in May new faces have been seen chairing some of the Scrutiny
Committees. Councillor Philip Read did a surprisingly good job at
the Finance
Committee meeting and last night it was councillor Alex Sawyer who was new
to the hot seat at the Crime and Disorder Committee. It used to be the case that
you could turn up at practically any Bexley council meeting and be confident of
witnessing an omnishambles. Not any more. If you hanker after the old days the
only meeting I would recommend is one chaired by councillor Alan Downing, with
luck you will not only see a shambles you might be privileged to
see him lose his temper. Not pretty.
By comparison Alex Sawyer is a total bore. He turns up the best dressed man
around the table, welcomes members of the public, does not insult them with the
routine warning about recording - he knows those present play by the rules - goes out of his way to ensure
the microphones are all used, doesn’t stamp on councillors for asking one
question too many, and when the meeting is over wishes everyone, public
included, a cheery "Goodnight gentlemen". I don’t really want to use the word
‘professional’ to describe the running of a Bexley council meeting but I fear I am going to have to.
However to make everyone feel at home we still have councillor Val Clark. Apart
from myself, ‘the public’ consisted only of three Bexley Council Monitoring Group (BCMG) members and Mick Barnbrook continued
his charm offensive against the
stuck up madam. She once again wafted by silently with her nose in the air refusing to acknowledge his greeting. I
have no idea what he sees in her, surely the pick of Bexley’s female bunch is Maxine?
But councillor Maxine Fothergill’s presence last night was not my reason for ruining another evening,
it was Borough Police Commander Victor Olisa. I’d heard some favourable reports but what is he like in the flesh?
He said he would address the meeting for ten minutes but failed miserably. He
finished in just over six. He revealed that he expected a three year posting to
Bexley and his priority was “safety in public places” and “to protect their
property”. He didn‘t want anybody “hurt or killed” and specifically mentioned
the elderly and the young. All the ‘acting’ police posts have gone and
everyone, or maybe almost everyone, is now doing their own basic job. As a result
the Commander currently has no deputy. He moved on to questions.
Chief
Superintendent Olisa is very different to his predecessor. CS Stringer would
answer quickly and one suspected a rehearsed response out of the Met’s Book of
Standard Answers. Olisa struck me as more thoughtful and more ready to give his
own honest opinion. Whilst Stringer would be on his politically correct best
behaviour, the new man repeatedly referred to his men as “cops”. It would be hard not to like him.
The councillors present were Kerry Allon, Brian Bishop, Val Clark, Graham
D’Amiral, Maxine Fothergill, Steven Hall, Philip Read, Michael Slaughter, John
Wilkinson, Brenda Langstead and Harry Persaud. Councillor Peter Craske, aged 42, who has always
put in a guest appearance at the Crime meeting in the past was absent, as was his
replacement, Gareth Bacon. The loss of Craske’s expertise in matters criminal did not prove to
be a problem. The only councillor who did not ask a question was Allon but the
others elicited the following information.
Olisa believed it will be challenging to maintain the recent good burglary figures and
in an unstated reference to earlier suggestions that Bexley’s burglary figures
might not have been all what they seemed to be, said “the figures will be obtained in an ethical way”.
The Commissioner’s plan to allocate Tasers in London will result in two of
Bexley’s vehicles being so equipped - but possibly not until after the Inner Boroughs get theirs.
Economic pressures mean that retiring officers are not being replaced and if
a PCSO opts to train as a ‘proper policeman’ that is likely to cause a vacancy
too. SNT (Safer Neighbourhood Teams) could reduce to as few as two officers per
ward and recruitment won’t restart until “after the Olympics”. I’m not sure I
should be repeating this but a rerun of last year’s riots would cause the police
to “struggle” but they will, given the experience gained, be “better prepared”.
The Commander was surprised to hear the opinion that people are reluctant to
report crimes and rejected Val Clark’s suggestion that test purchases at
licensed premises have been reduced. He gave some figures that squashed that view
fairly effectively. A suggestion that burglars are on a repeating cycle of
offending and imprisonment was met with some impressive statistics for arrests
and the comment that someone in Thamesmead will not be “filling his boots” for a little while.
In a later session Councillor Read reported on Domestic Violence. He was at pains
to point out he was taking a gender neutral view but revealed that most male victims
were in gay relationships. An interesting slant on a situation that most of us
would be able to guess. That the more aggressive sex is the male one.
Although
the meeting dragged on a little longer with a report from David
Bryce-Smith, Deputy Director (Development, Housing &
Community Safety), Chief Superintendent Olisa left before he delivered it. With my
nose in my notebook, I failed to notice until the floor boards groaned as they
always do when people move about the chamber. Glancing up I noted that BCMG members Mick
Barnbrook and Elwyn Bryant followed him out. The look on councillors faces made
a perfect picture, at least I thought it did until I saw a better one when Mick didn’t
come back for about 20 minutes, Elwyn rather earlier.
From what I could gather later the Commander was happy to listen to a brief history
of Bexley council’s criminal activities going all the way back to a previous Commander
enjoying meals at council expense, crooked expense claims and the consequent refusal
to lay criminal charges. It was all news to him, but not now.
5 July (Part 1) - We want Waitrose
Maybe it’s just me biased by Bexley council’s refusal to even accept a petition on their excessive salaries let alone act on it; but I do feel their own petition to influence Waitrose’s commercial decision not to open a store in Sidcup is ethically dubious. Maybe if they made better arrangements for the parking of delivery vehicles and potential customers it would have greater effect. However the petition bandwagon rolls on with a stall set out to promote it at the Danson Festival on the weekend of 7th/8th July and the drumming up of support among council staff. Here is another of the great Teresa O’Neill’s stunts, an appeal to Bexley council employees.
From: Ferry, John On Behalf Of Communications
Sent: 13 June 2012 09:36
To: All Bexley Users
Subject: 'We want Waitrose' petition
Message from the Leader of the Council, Cllr Teresa O'Neill
Good morning.
As you know we are undertaking a campaign to try to persuade Waitrose to
overturn the decision they have taken not to open their new unit in Sidcup as planned.
We have an on line petition, link as follows -
www.ipetitions.com/petition/we-want-waitrose
I do hope that many of you may feel able to support our campaign.
Thanks!
Teresa
Meanwhile, Waitrose has decided to open a new store in
Greenwich which will, according to the ‘853 blog’, have parking for 150 vehicles. I
suspect Waitrose knows far more about shopping than Teresa ever will.
To save readers the trouble of popping back here throughout the day to check for anything new, I
had better say there is unlikely to be anything as what material I have is
either too trivial or too complex. Take a look at the local press instead; today’s News Shopper plays catch up on
the Craske resignation story
and there is welcome publicity for
the Grootendorsts.
That’s about it - probably.
This evening the new police Borough Commander Victor Olisa will make his first
address to Bexley council’s Crime and Disorder Committee, 19:30 in the Civic
Centre. It will be the first time I will have heard him speak. Maybe you would
like to listen to what he has to say too. Otherwise you will have to fall back
on tomorrow’s blog.
3 July (Part 2) - The saga continues. More money wasted
As
I was passing nearby I thought I’d get some new photos of
the hedge which Mrs. Rita
Grootendorst trimmed. Not as much I had expected but a lot lower
than it was. She spotted me outside and asked if I had come to trim it further.
“Did I own a hedge trimmer?” I have no hedge so the answer was obvious but Mrs. G. was
genuinely wanting it trimmed further but feels unable to do it herself with the
tools she has. So if you are a neighbour and think the hedge should be for the
chop, now is your chance.
Last week Rita’s neighbour moved out and the house is now occupied by someone
new. So much for Bexley council’s claim that Rita is ruining the local area and
no one would want to live there.
The
inside of the house is still much as before. Mr. Grootendorst has done his best
to fix a few things but walking around upstairs you still take your life in your
hands. Floorboards are missing and broken and you can see straight down to the
garden below. The stairs are still dangerous but the doorway to oblivion through
which I came close to dropping is now blocked by an old suitcase.
The neglectful builder, Chris McGuiness of 17, Sheldon Road, Bexleyheath, DA8 4PB,
is still nowhere to be seen. Others have offered their sympathy but none can
take on the job for a month or two. The scaffolding company has generously
offered to keep the scaffold in place for a couple of months free of charge but
it has been deemed inadequate by the other construction companies. MAC Construction
(General Building) has a lot to answer for.
Meanwhile
Bexley council is doing its best to bankrupt the Grootendorsts.
Yesterday morning they were in court to make their Appeal against Bexley
council’s prosecution for allegedly ruining the local amenities. I made a passing reference to its
submission a month ago
but neither the Court officials nor Bexley’s solicitor gave any sign of having
read it so the hearing was a waste of everyone’s time and money. Instead of it
providing an opportunity for the Grootendorst’s legal representative to argue
that Bexley council is guilty of Abuse of Process, all that was achieved was
a deferment to October. It helps to keep the lawyers fees high.
Perhaps John Waring who is Bexley council’s chief persecutor in this case was
as disappointed as everyone else because he had brought a wheeled suitcase into
court, no doubt packed full of papers.
There is to be a case management meeting at Bexley Court at 2 p.m. on the 1st
October and a two day hearing commencing at 9.30 a.m. on Monday 22nd October 2012
at Bromley Magistrates Court.
Always nice to see what a vindictive Bexley council likes to spend your money on.
3 July (Part 1) - Pitch in says forking Teresa. It will “show how much we have in common”
The
Bexley magazine tumbled through my letterbox yesterday afternoon and the
leader’s column is filled with Olympics stuff. Bexley has “been closely involved
in the planning of the Games” and “Times like these … show how much we have in common”.
Does that sound like a reasoned argument?
I never saw Teresa O’Neill as the athletic type before, though she can be fairly quick off
the block when there is a chance to twist a policeman’s arm and get a critic locked up.
More surprising than the implication that Bexley has been a big player in the
Games (†) is Page 13 of the magazine where she and her scheming cohorts
encourage us to pitch in and see what our money has been forked out on (flags up
lamp posts) and descend on the Civic Centre and Danson Park with flaming torches.
Should we be scared witless like the Frightened Controller herself and sprint down to the cop shop PDQ?
Extract from police report on Teresa O’Neill’s complaint about me and Olly Cromwell
for the flaming torches comment originally made by another blogger. Olly hadn’t even referred to it.
The lying Teresa would have known that but chose to be dishonest. No change there then.
† There are six Olympic boroughs. Bexley isn’t one of them.
2 July (Part 2) - Man dead wrong
I
was buried under a pile of email to let me know I can’t count. There are not
ten ugly
signs on the former public conveniences, there are eleven, and three more
hidden away behind the building.
The green traffic cones show a great sense of style too.
2 July (Part 1) - Deadman right
I
set out to go to the Audit Committee meeting last Thursday expecting the usual
warm welcome from chairman Steven Hall.
But it wasn’t to be. When I arrived at the Civic Centre I bumped into the Bexley
Monitoring Group (BCMG) members who persuaded me that the place to be was the Standards
Committee meeting. Not if you wanted a warm welcome it wasn’t.
When we went into the partitioned public gallery it was obvious the assembled
councillors weren’t expecting company. They were huddled around a small table
and no provision had been made for the public apart from the usual agenda notice that
no one was allowed to record proceedings. Printed agendas were in short supply,
there were no chairs and although the public gallery is equipped with a hearing
loop there was not a microphone to be seen. I think it may be a condition of
membership of BCMG to be half deaf and I suspect they will be penning
complaints
to Mr. Hollier again.
We found some chairs with the help of a council employee and lined
them up about four feet behind the nearest members of the Committee. We were told to move
them further away. All the councillors had their backs to me but some observers may have
been able to see a little more. Councillor Alan Deadman seemed to be making some sort of
effort to angle himself into a position where he might be seen and heard but at the other extreme
councillor Val Clark spoke in a whisper. Given what I heard her come out with later it
may have been a wise decision.
The reason this particular Standards Committee was important is that all the
arrangements for keeping councillors in check are affected by the Localism Bill.
It is all change on 18th July and everyone must learn new tricks.
The
Committee Chairman is the ‘independent’ specially selected by councillors and paid
handsomely, Mr. Peter Richardson. Fortunately he spoke clearly when he presented
his proposals for life in Eric Pickles’ new world. They were based on the seven
Nolan Principles.
Selflessness. Integrity. Objectivity. Accountability. Openness. Honesty. Leadership.
One might wonder what the standards were before if that is all new stuff. However
before Mr. Richardson was able to commence discussion of his 15 recommendations,
councillor Deadman piped up with a radical new idea. Fairness.
He said that the public - I suspect he meant those of the public who read this blog,
because I do not detect it is a popular topic for discussion in wine bars or letter
pages of local newspapers - felt that decisions by the Standards Sub-Committee
were biased towards the ruling party and overall “the perception is that we look
after our own”. He suggested that the Standards Committee should abandon “proportionality”
and adopt “equality” instead. He meant that membership of the Standards Committee and
Sub-Committees should be split equally
between the parties and not in proportion to the seats held. The latter means
that when complaints are judged only one in seven hearings have any Labour
representation at all and then only a minor one.
Councillor
Cheryl Bacon immediately jumped in to deplore the idea but the longer
her mouth was open the more time she had to engage her brain and her opinion
appeared to mellow. Councillor Alex Sawyer has difficulty with
the word dismissive
but his brain is mostly firmly engaged and he strongly supported
the idea that the disciplinary Sub-Committees
should always have Labour Party representation. Not a lot, just one out of
three, but at least it is a move towards removing perceptions that Bexley
council’s enforcement of standards is a Conservative biased stitch-up.
Perceptions? What am I on about? There could hardly have been any doubt and
minority representation won’t change anything.
Councillor Bacon went along with the revised recommendation and so did councillor
Deadman, it’s probably as much as he could hope for, and it’s not in the bag yet. The
Committee’s recommendation will have to go before the full council for a vote.
Luddites are in the ascendancy there and there is at least one on the Standards
Committee. Step forward Val Clark, twice she said she was “confused” by what was
going on, the Nolan Principles in particular. When it comes to Leadership and
Integrity she is not on familiar ground as her
spell as mayor amply confirmed.
Under the new procedures it is a council employee, the Monitoring Officer, who
gets the last word if there is any dispute within a disciplinary
Sub-Committee. Councillor Deadman thought that put
him in “an invidious position”, potentially having to arbitrate between feuding
councillors who had the power to blight his career. His view was not widely
shared and councillor Clark was particularly vocal on the subject, at least I
think she was, even councillor Deadman said he couldn’t hear what she was saying.
What was very noticeable about the discussion is that complaints against
councillors were variously described as vexatious, frivolous and trivial but
never once as serious. It may provide an interesting insight into Bexley
council’s base position when it comes to judging complaints against councillors’
behaviour. After 75 minutes the meeting drew to a close and Mick Barnbrook of
the BCMG asked the outgoing committee chairman and Mr. Akin Alabi, the
Monitoring Officer and Deputy Director of Legal Services, if the sanctions
available under the Localism Bill allowed a councillor to be removed from
office. Unsurprisingly they did not, that is a job for the electorate. Warming
to his theme Mr. Barnbrook asked what Bexley council would do if it found itself
with a councillor convicted of a criminal offence. Alabi said he had sought government
guidance on that and would get back to Mr. Barnbrook as soon as he could.
I
noted that before the meeting began Mr. Barnbrook bid councillor Val Clark
a “Good evening councillor” as she passed by. She ignored him with her nose
pointing to the ceiling. On the way out Nicholas Dowling, another BCMG member,
repeated the greeting with the same result. Mr. Dowling was on the receiving end
of Clark’s wrath when he did not clap loudly enough for her liking at a
council meeting. “Parsimonious appreciation”
was her complaint when she spent good council money on looking up his address in council
records and posting him a reprimand for failing to applaud enthusiastically at her command.
Perhaps Nick should repeat the compliment and test out the new complaints procedure?
I shouldn’t leave you with the impression that all councillors are as
ill-mannered as Val Clark. To my knowledge and in
alphabetical sequence, councillors Chris Ball, Peter Catterall, Alan Deadman, Steven Hall, James
Hunt, Howard Marriner, Alex Sawyer and Colin Tandy will all engage in civil
conversation when the occasion arises. Hmm. Come to think of it it’s not many is it?
1 July - Lead astray by false profits
If
you read about the
regeneration of Bexleyheath Broadway you will know that Bexley council is
intent on taking over the precincts of Christ Church. The scheme was first put
to church members in October 2010, nearly two years ago, and they rejected the
idea. What changed their minds?
It seems that the Parochial Church Council (PCC) were bewitched by a freebie
extension of the red and pink setts right up to the church door.
“A God-given opportunity to make the church building
more welcoming and more obviously part of the community” said the Reverend
Francis Jakeman. Very possibly true but why give up valuable land for ever for
the price of a few paving slabs? The scrap value of the railings would have
offset the cost of laying their own.
Reverend Jakeman invited church members to discuss the plan after the morning
service exactly one week ago. I imagine that they may have been less than
impressed by the council’s plan which ignorantly referred to the “War Memorial”
in the church grounds when the memorial is to its first vicar, the
Reverend William Pincott, hence Pincott Road not far away.
Most of the congregation stayed behind after Eucharist to listen and there
were things not to like. The removal of the hedge that prevents wedding parties
trampling the flower beds for instance, but it turned out not to be a consultation
to allow "the PCC to be better placed to know how the congregation feels”. It was
more of a presentational fait accompli. A done deal. It had to be thus, council staff
had presented the scheme embodying church land at the Public Realm Committee meeting
three days earlier. Christ Church PCC appears to have allowed Bexley council’s land
grab in exchange for little more than a small patio. What on Earth possessed them to sanction
such a giveaway? Certain parishioners have a theory.
Where else would you expect questions to be brushed aside or unanswered or the shutters
run up leaving some unable to speak at all? It sounds a bit too like a Bexley council
meeting chaired by the mayor; and maybe it was. Who is the big-wig
on the Parochial Council most enthusiastically pushing for the scheme? None other
than former mayor of Bexley, Bernard Clewes who lost his Erith seat in 2010.
John, Chapter 11, Verse 35. The devils get everywhere!