5 November (Part 2) - Councillor Cheryl Bacon exposed due to council error. More evidence of lies
I
was a little slow to analyse Mrs. Tyler’s most recent excuse sheet for councillor Cheryl Bacon’s unlawful exclusion of members of the public from
the Public Realm meeting on 19th June.
The fact is I read her conclusion, noted that Bacon was found not guilty by the lawyer employed
by Bexley council and assumed the same old lies had been trotted out. How wrong I was.
Bexley council’s standard practice with complaints is to summarise the complaint
at the start of their reply. The summary provided to me clearly showed that Mrs. Tyler
had muddled me up with someone else. Someone prepared to say “The member
of the public allegedly at the centre of the “debacle” was not preventing the
meeting from occurring… [he was] sitting quietly reading the guidance about
attending public meetings issued by the Secretary of State for Communities and
Local Government”. That statement is clearly about Nicholas Dowling and looks
likely to have come from a councillor. If so I know which one it it is but I hope you will
understand that the name has to remain secret - at least until the file goes to the police.
So from right inside the bear pit you have confirmation that Nicholas Dowling
did nothing to disrupt the meeting other than clutch a
non-functioning match box sized recorder. The other members of the public
present did even less, certainly none of the shouting waving, remonstrating
described by the deluded, law breaking, caught like a rabbit in the headlights, Cheryl Bacon.
Whilst Bexley council can take six weeks to fail to answer my complaint, they
allow only three to respond to their nonsense; so I have had to get a move on.
My request for a review went in this morning. The general drift was…
Mrs. Tyler's reasoning is puzzling. She finds councillor Bacon was not in error
when she decided against a vote before moving into Closed Session. This is
irrelevant, I did not mention or complain about voting.
Mrs. Tyler has said that councillor Bacon was not in breach of any Standing
Order. Once again irrelevant as I made no such complaint.
Mrs. Tyler makes reference to a “debacle” and a “member of the public reading
the guidance about attending public meetings issued by the Secretary of State
for Communities and Local Government”. My complaint did not include the word
debacle or the phrase about the DCLG nor did I make any reference to "councillor
Bacon prevented the meeting from continuing". Not a word of Mrs. Tyler’s summary
is true, a fact easily confirmed by reading my complaint again. Mrs. Tyler would
appear to be creating fictional complaints to suit her lame excuses.
The whole thing
may be read here. The main
Index to the Cheryl Bacon lying saga
has been revamped to hopefully make it easier to read. I shall attempt to locate the missing documents in due course.