Banner
any day today rss X

News and Comment October 2023

Index: 2009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

1 October (Part 1) - The minutiae of parking rules are complicated

Parking injustice Parking injusticeThere was a train strike yesterday which means that London bound travellers flock to the Elizabeth line and Abbey Wood’s parking misery extends to the weekend.

The roads within the CPZ which are usually kept reasonably clear thanks to the 11-1 time restriction become crowded on strike afflicted weekends because it only operates Monday to Friday.

Nearer to home, that is, just outside the CPZ, a few of my neighbours pick up parking tickets almost daily. They did on Thursday, could have had one on Friday but were miraculously spared and yesterday they were fined again after returning home and finding nowhere to park in their own road or any adjacent one.

The rebellious streak in me says they should park in the road and block it because then they would be outside the Council’s jurisdiction and there is little chance of the police getting off of their lazy arses. The only time I made a report of a blocked road a very rude and ignorant police woman (Officer 244CC) insisted that blocked roads are a Council responsibility.

For as long as Bexley Council chooses to do nothing to face up to the Liz line parking issues it failed to see coming it will probably be raised here from time to time.

In one of several conversations with an enforcement officer a neighbour asked in my presence what could be done about people parking across driveways. His question wasn’t from the usual angle, his interest arose from the fact that he is engaged in a long term building project and it is convenient for contractors and delivery vehicles to park across his dropped kerb.

It was explained to him that if the dropped kerb is registered with the Council, and very few are, any car in front of it would be ticketed on sight without reference as to who the vehicle might belong to.

On unregistered dropped kerbs, like the concerned neighbour’s, no ticket would ever be issued for the same reason - but in reverse. The assumption would be that the vehicle belonged to the home owner or in some way associated with him.

My neighbour was reassured that his builders were safe from penalties.


Dropped kerbIt was this information that formed the basis of a recent blog which caused a reader to draw my attention to the Council’s dropped kerb guidance.

My drive is registered because it is only one car wide and is for my use only. Next door and the house beyond it have a double width dropped kerb with the complication that part of it goes around a right angled bend.

It does not qualify as a shared drive because the requirement of “usually wide enough for single vehicle access by two or more residents” excludes it. It is wider than “single vehicle access”.

As such the assumption is that it cannot be registered for parking enforcement but thanks to Bexley Council’s stupid road planning that may be arguable.

The kerb guidance goes on to say that a PCN can be issued to any vehicle parked in front of a shared or pedestrian dropped kerb, the latter being street corners etc. But next door the drives are not strictly shared by virtue of their width although the unusable bit around the right angled bend makes sharing a necessity.

The final guidance paragraph is more useful. As the CEO said to my neighbour and me they will not routinely ticket a car in front of a residential dropped kerb because it may be there with the permission of the home owner but they might do so on receipt of a report from the resident.

One wonders how the reporting source might be identified but the BiB reader’s contention that action might be taken against single access drive blocking looks to be correct. However the fact remains that Bexley Council more than once refused to help my immediate neighbour.

 

Return to the top of this page
Bonkers is a cookie free zone. Not a single one