Banner
any day today rss X

News and Comment August 2023

Index: 2009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

22 August (Part 2) - A lie too far

As I hope was made clear two days ago, I considered the complaint against the Council Leader for holding a political meeting on Council premises to be verging on the petty. I am sure they must hold strategy meetings in their Committee Rooms occasionally and which of us really cares if one overflows into the Council Chamber itself?

The complaint first came to my attention on 21st July but not reported here because I decided there was enough trivia on BiB without adding more.

But the issue is not trivial when the Monitoring Officer, that bastion of impartiality and honesty for any Council, lies about the meeting.

Susan Hall the Conservatives' Mayoral candidate who absolutely must defeat Sadiq Khan next May if London is to survive as a thriving metropolis, said it was a Conservative political meeting. We know that no Labour Councillor was invited which further indicates that it was a political meeting.

The Monitoring Officer, has stated that the meeting was a business meeting at which “other Councillors” were present implying that any could attend. Not true.

Another deception is that Councillors met with Mayoral candidates when the truth is that they only met the two Conservative candidates.

All the indicators were that the meeting was very much a Conservative Group event as Susan Hall said it was. Everything since has indicated that the Monitoring Officer is prepared to lie to cover for her bosses most minor of transgressions against the Code of Conduct rules. viz. Section 7.2b: When using Council resources ensure that such resources are not used for political purposes.
Narebor letter
The Monitoring Officer denies it but the rules were broken and I could barely care less but having a M.O. who is a stranger to the truth is something different entirely.

There is now documentary proof from an impeccable source within Bexley Council that the meeting was most definitely a political meeting and therefore the letter sent to @tonyofsidcup was a total fabrication.

She says there is nothing that he can do about it…

Narebor letter
… but there is.

Misconduct in a Public Office is a serious offence for which a sentence of life imprisonment may be passed.

Will Bexley Council dismiss their Monitoring Officer with immediate effect or do nothing and thereby prove beyond reasonable doubt that it condones dishonesty even where honesty is the whole raison d’etre for her post?

If she remains as a symbol of Bexley Council’s ingrained dishonesty someone will have to report her to the police. I thought my days of doing that were over but what is the point of BiB if it is prepared to gloss over such blatant dishonesty?

 

Return to the top of this page
Bonkers is a cookie free zone. Not a single one