9 December (Part 4) - Candidate makes his threat
There are hundreds of videos freely available on the web showing election candidates saying and sometime doing controversial things;
politicians must rue the day that someone squeezed a video camera inside a phone, TV
stations started putting news clips on the web and YouTube hosted a trillion bits of incriminating evidence.
I can dig them out and reproduce them here until my ISP sends me a stroppy
letter about the number of megabytes I have been putting on its server.
Here’s one of Jeremy Corbyn refusing to condemn the IRA’s bombing of innocent
people and eventually putting the phone down on his inquisitor. There is not a
thing he can do about it and God help the paratroops who served in Northern
Ireland in the 1970s and 80s if he is allowed to form a government.
Jeremy Corbyn refuses to condemn the IRA bombing of innocents.
I can do that about Red Jezza and no one complains but do it about a local candidate and the threats rain down.
You know nothing about what you are writing about except what the MSM have told
you. The entire case was a fraud. You have written a libellous article during an
election. Remove it or I will prosecute. What YOU have done is a criminal offence!
For the record I have not been in touch with any Main Stream Media,
sometimes, especially at weekends I idly browse around the web.
The blog which
is said to be libellous did not directly mention the candidate’s name but merely provided a link to an
interesting newspaper article; there are more but one was probably
sufficient. A YouTube video had the candidate himself boasting about his criminal past.
I took advice during the day and found no legal reason why the facts need to be suppressed during an election
period and have a clearer picture of the legalities of the nomination process. The blog remains off line
only because it is possible that people who spend five years in Belmarsh will have acquired some unsavoury friends.