27th April 2011
BEXLEY COUNCIL REVISES ITS CONSTITUTION
As part of its calculated act of defiance towards the Communities Secretary
Eric Pickles’ wish for greater openness and transparency in Local Government,
Bexley council bans a number of legitimate activities and takes steps to impede
questioning the council. Among them is that anyone who asks the council a formal
question must agree to their name and home address being published on the council’s
website. In a minor act of retaliation this website announces it will publish every
councillor’s address. They are already a matter of public record but cannot
be found all in one place.
17th May 2011
A REQUEST TO BEXLEY COUNCIL
A full list of addresses proves difficult to find so Mr. Elwyn Bryant phones
Bexley council seeking to take up his legal right to inspect the Register of
Members’ Interests. Mr. Chris Loynes, the then Head of Members’ Services
makes an appointment for the following Friday.
20th May 2011
REGISTER OF MEMBERS’ INTERESTS INSPECTION
At 2pm Elwyn Bryant and Malcolm Knight begin to make handwritten notes from
the Register. They are closely supervised by a council officer who is
alerted to several inconsistencies and inadequacies within the Register.
They leave at 4pm and on the way out exchange the briefest of friendly words
with Mr. Dave Easton, Chris Loynes’s deputy.
21st May 2011
OBSCENE BLOG GOES ON LINE
Yesterday’s visit to the council office together with earlier events is
blogged by someone who knows all the details. Someone who must have a very
direct connection with Chris Loynes and Bexley council.
The blog has been made available for reference but requires a user name and
password to hide it from search engines and protect against unintentional discovery.
. Password etc. provided.
29th May 2011
For no very good reason Malcolm Knight types his own name plus Bexley into
Google. The first item on the resultant list is www malcolmknight blogspot com
which upon examination proves to be full of homophobic obscenities and a
photograph of Elwyn Bryant.
The style is one of impersonation of Malcolm Knight and was posted to the web
at 08:50 the day after Elwyn and Malcolm had left the council offices at 4pm
and provides a totally false and obscene description of that visit.
In another paragraph the blog author details a visit to the Cinema Car Park
by Malcolm Knight and Nicholas Dowling in similar scurrilous terms. It makes
reference to another Bexley blogger known as ‘Olly Cromwell’.
Nicholas had seriously questioned the veracity of cabinet member Peter Craske’s
accounting when proposing a tripling of Controlled Parking Zone charges and
Craske’s attempts to fool the public with invented figures were published on
this website. Malcolm and Nicholas’s visit to the car park to take photographs must have
been picked up on CCTV. Cabinet member Peter Craske was in charge of Bexley’s
CCTV system at the time.
30th May 2011
ELWYN BRYANT INFORMED
Elwyn Bryant is notified of developments by email. The content of the
blogspot makes it absolutely certain that the source of the information must
be a senior member of Bexley council, a senior officer or a foolhardy
associate. MPs are informed and offer advice.
1st June 2011
Malcolm Knight meets members of the Bexley Council Monitoring Group (of
which Elwyn is a member) to discuss options. It is decided to alert the
council leader Teresa O’Neill and the chief executive Will Tuckley and
formulate a complaint to the police.
On the same day the obscene blogger compounds his criminal activities by
adding another entry to his blog.
3rd June 2011
BEXLEY COUNCIL ALERTED
Just as the council’s contact centre is closing for the weekend, letters are
handed in complaining about the Obscene Blog. From Elwyn Bryant to Teresa
O’Neill and Malcolm Knight to Will Tuckley.
6th June 2011
BLOG CONTENT DISAPPEARS
It is assumed that on this Monday morning Teresa O’Neill and Will Tuckley
receive their letters. It is not known whether they had to interrogate
councillors to discover the identity of the author or whether they knew the
culprit already, but later the same day the content of the Obscene Blog is
removed, leaving just the basic Google blogspot template.
8th June 2011
POLICE PROVIDE A CRIME NUMBER
After many references to their senior officers and an initial
attempt to reject the
crime report against Bexley council, two PCSOs accept the complaint and
having read of the allegations of homosexuality proceed to register Elwyn
and Malcolm as living at the same address. This is corrected before any harm
9th June 2011
WILL TUCKLEY REACTS
Malcolm Knight receives a letter from chief executive Will Tuckley that the
matter is so serious he has referred it to the police. It later
transpires that at no time did he ever follow up his crime report or make
any attempt to check on police progress making his professed concern look
like a charade.
14th June 2011
WILL TUCKLEY DOESN'T REACT
Malcolm Knight emails Will Tuckley asking what he did beyond getting the
Obscene Blog taken down. He doesn’t reply. Much later, under FOI, the council
claims to have not been in any way involved in removal of the Obscene Blog’s
content within hours of them being informed about it.
7th July 2011
POLICE VISIT COUNCIL OFFICES
DCI Alison Funnell and DI Neil Thomas visit Will Tuckley in his office and
tell him they consider the crime report relating to the Obscene Blog to be a
tit for tat response to Will Tuckley and others’ [false] accusations of
harassment. DI Thomas says there are no leads to proceed with. Will Tuckley
subsequently denies any investigation into the crime took place.
5th August 2011
TAKEN SERIOUSLY OR TAKEN FOR A RIDE?
Teresa Pearce MP emails Malcolm Knight to advise that
James Brokenshire MP had told her that he had been assured by CS Stringer
that the crime was being investigated seriously.
23rd August 2011
THE END OF THE ROAD
Malcolm Knight and Elwyn Bryant receive identical unsigned letters from
Bexleyheath police to say the investigation is at an end because their
various investigations had revealed nothing and there is no trace of the
blog left on the web. The latter is blatantly untrue, the blog, albeit with
the rude words removed is still sitting on Google’s servers and continues to
do so for another 3½ months.
3rd September 2011
LETTER TO CS STRINGER, BOROUGH COMMANDER
Malcolm Knight writes to the Borough Commander to bring to his attention the
fact that some of the assertions made in the unsigned letter dated 23rd
August could not be true.
6th September 2011
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
Malcolm Knight makes an FOI request seeking the dates of the claimed various
investigations. It is promptly refused under a perverse ‘Personal
9th September 2011
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION APPEAL
An Appeal that dates are clearly not ‘Personal’ is rejected, the excuse
being escalated to ‘Not in the Public Interest’. The Information Commissioner
subsequently refuses to intervene. Corruption runs deep.
Malcolm Knight‘s MP had taken an interest in the obscene blog from the day
it was discovered, Elwyn Bryant’s was also watching developments and Teresa
Pearce made her interest clear to Borough Commander Dave Stringer. It is
believed, but without absolute confirmation, that James Brokenshire did the
same at various times during the early Autumn months.
16th September 2011
Darren Williams as Acting Borough Commander writes to say that CS Stringer has
asked for the case to be reviewed by a Detective Inspector.
23rd September 2011
REVIEW COMMENCED (+)
DCI Pryde begins the review and notices that the original earlier submission to
the Metropolitan Intelligence Bureau (MIB) seeking a trace for the blog
source contained incorrect information such that the source would inevitably
prove untraceable. He resubmits it to the MIB with correct data.
A HIGH LEVEL LEAKER
A council informant began to exploit the newly introduced
anonymous contact system provided on the Bonkers website. He appears to hold a
senior position and has a keen interest in tracking the author of the
23rd October 2011
SOURCE TRACED (+)
The Intelligence Bureau identifies the source of the Obscene Blog and
Bexleyheath police are informed.
26th October 2011
CHRIS LOYNES FINGERED
An anonymous council informant (†
) suggests that the Head of Members’
Services should be considered to be a prime suspect as the obscene blogger.
Mr. Loynes, who died in September 2012, had by then gone sick, apparently suffering from stress.
There are also references to the Tory elite being versed in “the black arts”
and that they are cultivating Eric Pickles to ensure they get away with
defying his wishes. A photograph is offered as ‘proof’, and finally the
assertion that Bexley council is run by a “gay mafia”.
5th November 2011
COMMUNICATIONS TEAM FINGERED
An anonymous council informant says that a member of the Tory
Communication Team is responsible for the Obscene Blog.
8th November 2011
An anonymous informant gets to be very specific about who is the obscene blogger.
All the circumstantial evidence fits and this website begins to drop hints.
22nd November 2011
NOT A CRIME OR A SERIOUS CRIME? TAKE YOUR PICK
At a meeting of Bexley Community Police Engagement Group there is much
confusion on display by senior personalities present about Bexley council’s
Obscene Blog. A Bexley councillor says it is not in his opinion a crime. James Cleverly, London Assembly Member
says that the Bonkers blog is the one that is “well out of order” and
Chief Inspector Ian Broadbridge when questioned about the Bonkers blog
talks about another blog entirely, Olly Cromwell’s.
To everyone’s surprise Chief Superintendent Stringer announces
that the investigation into Bexley council’s Obscene Blog is ongoing. The
previous official advice had come three months earlier to the effect that it
was all over.
2nd December 2011
In a letter on another subject (the issue of a harassment warning to Malcolm
Knight following untruthful comments to the police by council leader Teresa
O’Neill and chief executive Will Tuckley) Chief Inspector Tony Gowen
suggests a meeting.
11th December 2011
Malcolm Knight accepts in writing the offer of a meeting.
14th December 2011
BLOG TEMPLATE DISAPPEARS
The remnants of the obscene blog were being monitored every few
days and on 14th December it is noticed that the subdomain name is no
longer registered on Google’s server. In retrospect it seems possible that
this was due to belated police contact with Google.
12th January 2012
Chief Superintendent Stringer confirms by email that a meeting is to
be arranged. Date not yet known.
29th January 2012
CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE DISCREDITED
At a meeting of interested parties it becomes apparent that the obscene blog
related information provided by an anonymous informant within Bexley council is
seriously wide of the mark. It is near certain that the names provided were
absolutely wrong and no more oblique reference to them is made on this website.
10th February 2012
A MEETING WITH CHIEF SUPERINTENDENT DAVE STRINGER
Malcolm Knight, Elwyn Bryant, Teresa Pearce MP and a senior paid official
from Victim Support’s HQ meet CS Stringer, his acting deputy CI Tony Gowen
and the newly appointed to the case Detective Sergeant. Very little is learned
except that the investigation is at a sensitive stage, that the issue of the
Harassment Letter Form 9993 to Malcolm Knight and the Obscene Blog is directly
linked and that we must be patient. “Trust us” is the term repeatedly used.
Malcolm Knight was asked not to refer to the matter on his blog because the
suspect may be taking evasive action based on what he learns there.
It was agreed that the new DS would keep Elwyn Bryant and Malcolm
Knight informed of developments at monthly intervals.
15th February 2012
CPS REJECTS POLICE CASE (†††)
Police case rejected because of time limitations according to a statement by the CPS made a whole year later.
16th February 2012
IP ADDRESS CONFIRMATION (†)
The earliest date on which the police file records absolutely that the obscene
blog was traced to an IP address used at the time by councillor Peter Craske.
15th March 2012
FILE GOES TO CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE
At one of their scheduled meetings CS Stringer tells Teresa Pearce MP that
“investigations are complete and a file has been sent to the CPS”. Six days
later the Acting Deputy Borough Commander said the same to Malcolm Knight and
Elwyn Bryant followed by the investigating DS a further four days later.
18th April 2012
The DS advises Malcolm Knight that the CPS has returned the file and
it is assumed that more investigation is required.
The CPS later insists the file was still with them on 26th April 2012. (†††)
17th May 2012
MEETING THE POLICE COMMISIONER
Elwyn Bryant attends a ‘Meet the Commissioner’ meeting at Sidcup school.
The new Borough Commander Victor Olisa is also in attendance. Elwyn tells
of Bexley council’s Obscene Blog
and the slow progress and inadequate communication until recently.
He is referred to the new Commander after the meeting.
Hogan-Howe says if Elwyn is not satisfied after a week he should refer the
matter to the Commissioner’s Office.
After the meeting Chief Superintendent Olisa takes notes and contact details
28th May 2012
The DS advises that he intends to apply for a search warrant.
(Seven months after the suspect had been identified.)
29th May 2012
Malcolm Knight emails the DS warning him that applying for a search warrant
at Bexley Magistrates’ Court is tantamount to tipping off Bexley council
that action is imminent. Too many of the magistrates are councillors. The DS
does not reply.
30th May 2012
NEW COMMANDER PHONES
Borough Commander Victor Olisa telephones Elwyn Bryant to tell him that a
search warrant would be applied for and would be executed at some time
within the next month. Elwyn expresses his dismay at the further delay and
Olisa tells him he had “not been fair” in complaining of delay to the
. Elwyn reminds the Commander
that the crime is now a year old and should have been solved within weeks. Olisa
admits he didn’t know it was that old.
7th June 2012
COMPLAINT TO COMMISSIONER HOGAN-HOWE
Malcolm Knight and Elwyn Bryant decide to take up the Commissioner’s
invitation to let him know if Commander Olisa fails to satisfy them. His
laid back attitude and the failure of the DS to reply to Malcolm Knight’s
email about the search warrant is seen as the last straw.
The complaint concentrates on the previous Commander apparently doing nothing
to investigate the case until MPs took an interest. Before that the impression
given was that his friends in Bexley council must be protected at all costs. MPs
lend their support to the complaint.
12th June 2012
The Commissioner writes to say that he has referred the complaint to his
Directorate of Professional Standards.
21st June 2012
The DS advises that “an individual has been arrested, interviewed and
released”. Malcolm Knight puts forward his theory to the DS that there may be a
connection between his and Nicholas Dowling’s capture and identification on CCTV to cabinet
member Peter Craske. The DS asks who Craske is and Malcolm explains that Craske
is in charge of CCTV surveillance in the borough. The DS
leaves Malcolm Knight convinced the connection is irrelevant and a red herring.
26th June 2012
A Labour Party insider, not an elected one, tells Malcolm Knight that Bexley Tories are
saying that a councillor “is the obscene blogger” and that
the News Shopper is aware of it.
27th June 2012
The News Shopper makes enquiries of Malcolm Knight but he can tell them
nothing because apart from hearing rumours he knows nothing beyond the fact
of an arrest.
28th June 2012
Peter Craske fails to turn up for his presentation of the Broadway
Regeneration Scheme which gives rise to speculation.
29th June 2012
Mick Barnbrook of the Bexley Council Monitoring Group is informed by Bexley
Council that his question that was accepted for Peter Craske at the next
council meeting could no longer be put to him.
1st July 2012
CRASKE RESIGNS HIS CABINET POSITION
For “personal reasons” according to leader Teresa O’Neill.
4th July 2012
The News Shopper reports on page 4 that
councillor Peter Craske has resigned his cabinet
position for personal reasons. On page 7 it makes an unrelated report that a
42 year old from Sidcup was arrested on 21st June for misconduct in
public office and bailed until 6th September 2012.
12th July 2012
DIRECTORATE OF PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS
The DPS despite the references to MPs’ interest and possible corruption
at senior level in Bexleyheath police station writes to say it has handed
the case over to Bexleyheath’s Professional Standards Unit. Thus we are
expected to accept subordinate officers investigating their more senior
20th July 2012
RESPONSE TO DIRECTORATE OF PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS
Malcolm Knight and Elwyn Bryant send a letter to the DPS which names five
police officers working at Bexleyheath in 2011 detailing their many failures
and provides evidence of their protection of Bexley council. The current
investigating officer and the new Borough Commander are not included on the
17th August 2012
DIRECTORATE OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CHANGES TACK
The DPS phones to say they agree that the case is not appropriate for
investigation by Bexleyheath police. An exchange of emails over the
following two weeks sees an agreement to formally investigate three Bexleyheath
police officers for their alleged role in attempting to bury or otherwise fail
to investigate the obscene blog in 2011.
24th August 2012
POLITICAL INTERFERENCE (++)
Acting Superintendent Tony Gowen, Assistant Borough Commander for Bexley, writes to Bexley
council Chief Executive Will Tuckley seeking an urgent meeting to “resolve” the
Peter Craske issue.
As it was by then known that the crime was committed by an individual operating
from Peter Craske’s address, Bexley council should not have been involved in the
investigation in any way.
6th September 2012
POLICE PRESS OFFICE STATEMENT
Press sources reveal that the individual reported by the News Shopper on 4th
July has been bailed again to 16th October 2012.
7th September 2012
Some websites (not all local) report that councillor Peter Craske is involved in
a “police probe”. Malcolm Knight advises those that he is able to contact that
he has not himself received any confirmation or even a hint that this might be true.
Most websites withdraw the comment.
7th September 2012
ENQUIRY TO BEXLEYHEATH POLICE
Malcolm Knight emails the investigating police officer to ask if he has
anything new to report. He says his suspect has been bailed until October - no
precise date specified. When pressed for a reason for the delay he refuses
absolutely to give one except that “the investigation is being progressed”. The
response also makes a vague reference to additional suspects. The police refuse
10th September 2012
NEWS SHOPPER NAMES CRASKE
The News Shopper’s website reports that councillor Peter Craske is at the centre
of a police probe. They do not say what it is about. A link with Bexley council’s
obscene blog remains unproven.
13th September 2012
POLITICAL INTERFERENCE (††)
Detective Inspector Paul Mackintosh meets with Bexley council leader Will Tuckley
to discuss how to “resolve the Peter Craske situation”.
Bexley council was not part of the investigation into Peter Craske after their
plea of innocence was accepted by Bexley police in July 2011. Proven to be a
correct declaration by October 2011. The meeting could not have been held except
for dishonest purposes.
17th October 2012
SERIOUS CRIMES UNIT - THEIR NEW STATEMENT
The suspect/s were bailed again on 16th October 2012. No new date was given but unlike
previous police statements this one comes from a higher ranked officer in their
Serious Crimes Unit.
17th October 2012
MORE OBSCENITIES WRITTEN
Just one day after the suspect was bailed again and councillor Craske was observed
arrogantly strutting around the council chamber for the first time in many
months, someone felt confident enough to send two web form generated messages to
Malcolm Knight. The content once again referred to homosexual practices.
19th October 2012
OBSCENITIES INDEPENDENTLY TRACED
An internet trace initiated by Malcolm Knight revealed an Internet Protocol (IP)
address for the source of the two obscene messages. An enquiry to Réseaux IP Européens (RIPE)
produced a real name and address. Parsons Brinckerhoff Ltd, the company with which councillor
Craske had placed four million pounds’ worth of business.
The police were informed.
22nd October 2012
NEW INVESTIGATING OFFICER
The Detective Sergeant who has been on the case since February 2012 is replaced
25th October 2012
SUSPECT RELEASED FROM BAIL CONDITIONS
Police announce that their suspect has been released from bail but he remains a
suspect and the investigation continues.
29th October 2012
NEW CRIME REGISTERED
Bexleyheath police accept a report on the two recent obscene messages as a new crime
linked to the original obscene blog.
4th November 2012
Elwyn Bryant writes to Borough Commander Victor Olisa putting before him 11 questions about the case. Olisa does not reply.
15th November 2012
Elwyn Bryant writes to Borough Commander Victor Olisa requesting a meeting.
21st November 2012
Chief Superintendent Victor Olisa of Bexleyheath police refuses Elwyn Bryant’s
request for a meeting and makes no effort to answer his questions of 4th
November 2012. He suggests a meeting with a Detective Inspector instead.
30th November 2012
Elwyn Bryant seeks a meeting with the DI as suggested by C.S. Olisa but
discovers the new DI has already been transferred to other duties. He settles
for a meeting with a Detective Sergeant instead.
4th December 2012
Police confirm that councillor Peter Craske was the man arrested for obscene
blogging and the IP address trace led directly to his house. One of his
communications devices is still undergoing forensic analysis. The obscene
messages from the company with which Craske had dealings were found to be absent
from the police file. This was remedied but another six weeks has been lost
12th January 2013
Police advise that Detective Chief Inspector Gary Holmes has decided that there is no
evidence that can be laid before the Crown Prosecution Service and that his
investigation is at an end.
18th January 2013
CRIME WILL BE ALLEGED
Malcolm Knight informs Bexley police that he intends to allege that up to ten
police officers have been guilty of conspiring to pervert the course of justice.
19th January 2013
Chief Superintendent Victor Olisa offers a meeting.
21st January 2013
PETER CRASKE TO BE CHARGED
Crown Prosecution Service informs Elwyn Bryant that they advised Bexley police to
charge councillor Peter Craske. The date of that advice is unknown.
24th January 2013
Malcolm Knight accepts offer of a meeting and lists the 17 areas where he
suspects police maladministration. The acceptance was not acknowledged.
3rd February 2013
CPS writes to Elwyn Bryant to confirm some of their telephoned advice and when
it was given. The letter does not arrive until 19th February.
7th February 2013
ENQUIRY TO CPS
Elwyn Bryant writes (emails) to ask a senior CPS manager why they decided not to
proceed with the prosecution of councillor Peter Craske.
19th February 2013
Senior CPS manager writes to Elwyn Bryant to say that he does not regard the
police investigation to be complete and Bexley police were so informed but they
chose to ignore his advise and guidance.
22nd February 2013
MEETING TO BE ARRANGED
Chief Superintendent Olisa contacts Teresa Pearce MP as a preliminary to arranging a meeting
between him, the MP, her constituent Malcolm Knight and Elwyn Bryant.
25th February 2013
A Sergeant advises Malcolm Knight and Elwyn Bryant that a meeting has been
arranged for 1st March.
1st March 2013
Malcolm Knight, Elwyn Bryant and Teresa Pearce MP met Chief Superintendent
Victor Olisa and Detective Garry Holmes in Olisa’s office at Bexleyheath Police
Station to discuss the failed investigation into Bexley council’s obscene blog.
The meeting was initiated by CS Olisa on 19th January 2013. CS Olisa suggested
that the six month delay between identifying the suspect and applying for a
search warrant was because Malcolm Knight had become a suspect.
20th March 2013
COUNCIL, POLICE & CPS COLLUDE
Bexley council says it did not minute the meeting it held with the police and
CPS on 13th September 2012 to “to try to resolve Peter Craske’s situation”.
1st June 2013
SUBJECT ACCESS REQUEST
Teresa Pearce MP submits a Subject Access Request to the police with the
permission of her constituent Malcolm Knight.
18th September 2013
IPCC UPHOLD COMPLAINT AGAINST MET.
IPCC rules that the Metropolitan Police’s enquiry into their own failed
investigation up to23ed August 2011 was inadequate.
18th September 2013
IPCC UPHOLD COMPLAINT AGAINST MET.
IPCC rules that the Metropolitan Police’s enquiry into their own failed
investigation up to23ed August 2011 was inadequate.
3rd December 2013
In the absence of any SAR response which might shed more light on the case a
complaint is made about Bexley police’s reinvestigation of the case post August
6th January 2014
DIRECTORATE OF PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS RESPONSE
A police constable at the DPS rejects the complaint on the grounds that it
refers to events more than a year old.
12th January 2014
RESPONSE TO DPS
DPS challenged to provide statutory authority for their rejection and reminded
that the events complained of were not revealed until long after they took place
and well within the DPS’s arbitrary time limit.
14th January 2014
SUBJECT ACCESS REQUEST RESPONSE
The long awaited SAR response confirms that the letter of 23rd August 2011
stating no evidence was available was untrue and that after the suspect was
identified it was proposed that the victims be told that the investigation was
at an end. It also revealed that the suggestion that Malcolm Knight had
attempted to frame councillor Peter Craske was entirely untrue.
18th January 2014
FURTHER RESPONSE TO DPS
Information extracted from the SAR allows the letter of 12th January to be
22nd January 2014
MISCONDUCT IN PUBLIC OFFICE
An allegation of Misconduct in Public Office against Chief Superintendents Dave
Stringer and Victor Olisa is sent to the Metropolitan Police Commissioner.
30th January 2014
MISCONDUCT IN PUBLIC OFFICE
The Metropolitan Police Deputy Commissioner replies.
February to June 2014
Various letters exchanged. See Index
Facts are noted in chronological sequence as the case
progressed except where otherwise indicated.
(+) Revealed/admitted on 15th December 2012.
(++) Revealed/admitted on 5th January 2013.
(†) Revealed/admitted on 13th January 2013.
(††) Revealed/admitted on 18th January 2013.
(†††) Letter from CPS dated 3rd February 2013.
It was assumed at the time that the anonymous references to the Obscene Blog were all coming
from the same source but as such communications arrive totally devoid of any
identifying information it could not be an absolute fact. In July 2012
information was received which strongly suggested two or more sources.