Banner
today rss facebook twitter

The single request was rejected as being ‘personal’. The four part one was designed to discover which question had been marked ‘personal’.

Single Freedom of Information Request
2 September 2011
Four Freedom of Information Requests
21 October 2011
I have received an unsigned letter dated 23 August 2011 from Bexley Borough Crime Management Unit. It bears reference number 3606909/11. That is an incorrect number, it should be 3906909/11.

The letter tells me that “all enquiries [about the crime against myself] have been exhausted” and also states that “It can be confirmed that at the point the blog was discovered, it was removed from the original server”.

This cannot be true, the blog address www malcolmknight blogspot com is still valid and is present on Google’s server now. The content has been removed but the page that was registered by the criminal blogger still exists.

Please advise me under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act the date on which you contacted Google and their response when you asked them who their registered blogger was?

The letter also says “All Bexley Council Computers have been subject to a vigorous audit”. Please provide to me the schedule of all the Bexley council’s computers (desktop machines, laptops and mobile devices) belonging to staff, councillors and in libraries that were audited, including date of each audit and the nature of each audit.

Please confirm under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act the date on which you took a copy of Bexley council’s Apache or Windows server logs, the dates those logs spanned and the rank and qualifications of the Data Specialist to whom you sent it for analysis.

The obscene and hateful blog content was removed immediately after council Leader Teresa O’Neill and Chief Executive Will Tuckley were advised of its existence. Please advise under the Terms of the Freedom of Information Act if you interviewed either of them and if so the date of the interview, the rank of the police officer and whether a connection was admitted.
I have received an unsigned letter dated 23 August 2011 from Bexley Borough Crime Management Unit. It bears reference number 3606909/11. That is an incorrect number, it should be 3906909/11.

The letter tells me that “all enquiries [about the crime against myself] have been exhausted” and also states that “It can be confirmed that at the point the blog was discovered, it was removed from the original server”.

This cannot be true, the blog address www malcolmknight blogspot com is still valid and is present on Google’s server now. The content has been removed but the page that was registered by the criminal blogger still exists.

Please advise me under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act the date on which you contacted Google and their response when you asked them who their registered blogger was?

The letter also says “All Bexley Council Computers have been subject to a vigorous audit”. Please provide to me the schedule of all the Bexley council’s computers (desktop machines, laptops and mobile devices) belonging to staff, councillors and in libraries that were audited, including date of each audit and the nature of each audit.

Please confirm under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act the date on which you took a copy of Bexley council’s Apache or Windows server logs, the dates those logs spanned and the rank and qualifications of the Data Specialist to whom you sent it for analysis.

The obscene and hateful blog content was removed immediately after council Leader Teresa O’Neill and Chief Executive Will Tuckley were advised of its existence. Please advise under the Terms of the Freedom of Information Act if anybody at all was interviewed in connection with this case and if so the date of the interview and the rank of the police officer.
Return to the top of this page