any day today rss twitter

Bonkers Blog July 2013

Index: 200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020

13 July (Part 1) - Rattled!

CampbellTen minutes before last Tuesday’s cabinet meeting began, Mr. Elwyn Bryant asked his councillor, Colin Campbell “if he could have a word” and the obnoxious oaf said “I have no intention of speaking to you”. Elwyn had to resort to email instead.

As residents in the ward you represent, Nicholas [Dowling] and I request a meeting with you to discuss in detail the conversation you had on the Sunday Politics Show with presenter Tim Donovan on the subject of filming and recording of Council meetings. I would be much obliged if you would let me know what date time and venue that would be suitable for you to meet us, any date after Fri. 19th July.
Yours sincerely,

Campbell replied with the same message he had earlier sent to Nicholas Dowling, he didn’t even edit the names…

Thank you for your note which does not include any issues of relevance and I have no intention of wasting my time responding to your own and your friends time wasting emails

I note your association with the Bexley is Bonkers web site and the so called “action group” through your association with messers Bryant, Barnbrook, Knight in particular. Although i waste no time looking at the site nevertheless i do sometimes hear of the bizarre contents. Given your clear association with these people and this web site you must take some responsibility. I have no wish to have any dealings with you or your friends connected to Bexley is Bonkers.

As regards my recent TV appearance I understand your friend Mr Barnbrook has complained about the truthful facts and accordingly I will waste no further time on this matter.

May I repeat my offer if you have any genuine issues as a constituent I will endeavour to deal with them or find someone to assist you.

So there you have it. Be associated with this website and you are a second class constituent. Transparency is not a genuine issue. Take your vote elsewhere.

Councillor Campbell knows about an ‘Action Group’ which was first mentioned here only three weeks ago and nowhere else. He seems to be more than a little interested in what is said here after all.


Return to the top of this page